Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ha never thought of that, Ill hit you up in a week. :) any engine bay pics? , sounds pretty sexual .

Will do after the weekend. I would have gone the Jun route, but i had a Greddy style and nothing to do with it (was initially for an S13 with an RB30DET, as the stock plenum didnt clear the bonnet, but went R32 head instead).

Mine was <$500 for the plenum and 80mm billet TB, almost half what the JUN style inc TB's cost, not sure how much performance difference there would be, but the JUN is definately more ideally suited for N/A due to the bellmouth's, longer and identical length intake runners.

I had a look on a plenum calculator, and for peak volumetric efficiency at 6000rpm i need 12" intake runners with a 2" diameter - somthing ill make at somepoint, until then the greddy should keep me happy. Mainly wanted it for the larger TB, and to get the intake away from the hotside of the engine, as well as the benefit from a much shorter intake pipe to CAI. Not sure what it will do for VE gain, as i think the runners may be too short, time will tell :blink:.

ECU is microtech LT12S, GTR loom, 550cc injectors (low duty cycle for better efficiency taking advantage of the sequential injection) fujitsumoto jasma tuned length extractors, 3" mandrel exhaust (1 centre offset mandrel glass packed perforated muffler, straight through resonator, no cat) 1.5mm gap 7 heat range plugs, upgraded coilpacks, 255, 8.3deg cams & >11.5:1 compression ratio.

once its together, should be quite angry. Had this in the works for a while, but i got distracted with yet another car (30e+t) made some big numbers with it, got bored, its done now so i'm back to my N/A ways on this old project.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/276959-rb25de/#findComment-4688111
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...