Jump to content
SAU Community

1994 R33 Gts-t $7000ono Qld

240k convertible
 Share

Recommended Posts

240k convertible Contributor

240k convertible

Posted
Posted

For Sale

1994 R33 GTS-T Skyline RB25det Manual $7000ono

I'm selling it cheap as I have just bought a 07 4x4 hilux and need it gone.

The Good

It has been used as a daily driver without any problems.

Aircon works fine just been regassed a month ago.

It is mod plated for a turbo, piping and intercooler but only has a modified intercooler on it, still running std turbo. The mod plate info hasn't got a brand of turbo listed so you can put on whatever type you want.

Nismo mags and 300km dash.

The car drives nice with a minimal bodyroll but still doesn't destroy your spine on a long drive. I was going to keep this as a toy but the gf won't approve so it has to go . . . something about a 1 skyline at a time rule.

Led tail lights

The Bad

The timing belt was replaced recently but when it was done the bearings weren't replaced, they now make noise and will need to be replaced.

The fuel pump works fine but makes an annoying noise.

8 ball gearstick (sooooo lame)

stupid blow off valve that doesn't work

Other than that the car is fine.

Test drives are welcome but I won't be letting anyone behind the wheel until they show me the money! I can meet people at Garden City or near there.

Call Andrew on 040 666 55 45

It is the Beetroot coloured (someone actually had it resprayed this colour) 33 behind my gf, I'll post more pictures in time to come.

P8231016.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/287922-1994-r33-gts-t-7000ono-qld/
Share on other sites
240k convertible Contributor

240k convertible

Posted
  • Author
Posted
how much to fix bearings?

That depends on if you can do the job yourself, if so it will cost $40 for replacement bearings minimum, you should really do the water pump which I'm not sure of the cost, at the same time. The timing belt that's in it has only had a couple of thousand kms on it but some would replace that as well. I had planned to do it all my \self but started a new job and had to buy the ute.

how many kms?

the clock says 157076 but as you can see the numbers aren't nice and even so it's suspect. To confuse matters more the transport dept have it listed at 166,000kms. The engine has been replaced recently and was supposedly 80,000ish k's, this was when they put the new belt in and didn't bother with the bearings.

P9170010.jpg

If your keen it's best to come and see the car as it's surprisingly good for the price. I spent a long time finding one so nice and cheap but am not allowed it as a company car so it has to go. I'm not greedy so I'm passing on my savings to whoever buys it. There is no point having two skylines as toy cars so the 33 has to go.

P9170003.jpg

P9170005.jpg

P9170011.jpg

P9170004.jpg

P9170009.jpg

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      RB20DE NEO smallbox clutch.

      By Kapr · Posted

      For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...