Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After blowing a head gasket, we've replaced everything and put it all back together.

Started the car up ... it runs ok but its a bit lumpy and there's no white smoke anymore! woohoO! Could the lumpy idle be contributed to not having set the crank angle sensor position correctly? ie. the timing is out?

Also there's a whirring noise coming from the cambelt ... does that mean it's too tight?

Cheers!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/29494-head-back-on-lumpy-idle-etc/
Share on other sites

Yep chances are the belt is too tight. If its a new belt chances are it will make noise any way. Give it a while and see if the noise gradualy goes away.

Lumpy idle could be possibly a tooth out, or ignition timing. It could be many other things too.

Michael...

Ok I've loosened off the cam belt and then retightened the tensioner, and the whirring noise has gone away :) Cheers for that!

Now to the other problem which I feel is quite alarming. It still sounds like it's "missing", even when I rev it, the engine sounds like its only running on 5 cylinders even though I'm sure all 6 are firing. The alarming part is that after I turned the car off and removed the radiator cap, the coolant spurted out. Isnt that the sign of a blown head gasket? :D :D

was the coolant bled of air properly before this happened, if not itll spray everywhere if the coolant is even remotely warm, as i found out last time i tried to bleed the coolant from there, whoops. just do it from the little attatchment on the inlet manifold and check it again

cant help with your other problems tho

do you know what caused the head gasket to fail in the first place?

Ok I've loosened off the cam belt and then retightened the tensioner, and the whirring noise has gone away :) Cheers for that!

Now to the other problem which I feel is quite alarming. It still sounds like it's "missing", even when I rev it, the engine sounds like its only running on 5 cylinders even though I'm sure all 6 are firing. The alarming part is that after I turned the car off and removed the radiator cap, the coolant spurted out. Isnt that the sign of a blown head gasket? :D :D

James, try taking the cap off while the engine is running . Be careful as it will be hot and what you are looking for is constant bubbling in the water as it passes the filler neck. Most cars will blow water out immediately after you stop the engine.

Are you sure it's missing above idle ? Missing at idle means you probably have an airleak.

Try spraying some crc or contact cleaner , once again be careful as it is flammmable, around the intake manifold and injectors. If the revs rise then that usually means it's drawing in air and running lean at that cylinder.

Cheers

Ken

Bleed both the inlet plenum and the little bung that is teed from the heater hoses against the firewall.

With regards to lumpy idle due to a tooth being out.

Mine was a tooth out on the crank. It didn't appear to idle lumpy however it was more gutless down low. There was a noticible gain in the low rpm torque when it was all set right.

Like Joel I had my exhaust cam wheel one tooth off and idle was completely normal, and there was no missing even in upper revs. The car just died in the arse power-wise above 4000rpm (so it must have been the opposite direction to Joel). Being one tooth off isn't a guaranteed way to make the engine miss, although I'm sure it's possible. Look for other things too.

check for air leaks @ all the inlet fittings ,listen for vaccum sounds from a hose incorrectly fitted,get someone with a co2 tester to check carbon dioxide levels in cooling system,this will tell you for sure if the new head gasket is sealing correctly,if you unplug 1 injector @ a time you can usualy iscolate which cylinder it is ,if it is only 1 cylinder!did you get the head milled when you replaced the gasket!

1 tooth is a big step on the std RB20 cam gears

if its 1 tooth out then youd notice alot more than a lumpy idle

id be thinking along the same lines as ken - an air leak somewhere. theres alot of hoses that have to come off in order for the head to come off, just make sure youve got them all connected properly and there arent any small cracks in them. (alot of the hoses on the firewall side of the head needed replacing on mine as they were worn out from age and heat exposure)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...