Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This isn't really quite the right forum for this question.

Pictured is the bottom (sump removed) of an N1 block with R34 crank, when last in motion, it had no oil pressure.

how it got that way is an interesting story I can type if anyone is curious. I've posted months ago on it, but basically

it involved getting ones timing belt changed at a "tuning shop" in sydney.

My questions are the following..

* see the shiny triangles ground off the crank, what are they?

* see the oil pump cog, and snout? the snout is damaged and there is molten and solidified metal blobs in the area. The stock damper has a crack in its inner most sleeve as well, I believe that perhaps this whole thing will be difficult to remove (I'd like to look inside this pump to see the undoubtedly fractured gear) How do I remove it?

* the bores are perfect, the piston tops perfect, where will I see bearing damage (for my own curiosity)? or where to look for any other damage? remove any pair of bolts pictured and look at the crank or the bearing sleeves?

* how do you turn the crank when the block is like this on a stand or whatever

* how do I keep this in good shape if I want to wait a while. do I clean off the oil and dry out the water jacket somehow?

I said they were basic questions!

ultimately I'd be sending this away to get refreshed, but I'm kind of interested in doing some of it myself.

Anyone got a brief description of what I would do?

for example: remove oil pump and free up crank, remove crank and send it away to get checked or re-machined, Buy new pump & bearings, and re-assemble and torque the bolts correctly and with the correct tools.

post-51561-1257819164_thumb.jpg

post-51561-1257819177_thumb.jpg

post-51561-1257819193_thumb.jpg

the triangles you mention inthe first picture have been machined, either for clearance or balancing reasons

the 2nd and 3rd picture shows the snout has been chewed up, repair to cost of a new/2nd hand crank, well id sugest to buy a new or 2nd hand crank

turn while on engine stand use a socket (usually 27mm) on the bolt that holds the harmonic balancer onto the snout, only turn clockwise

crank is throw away. Look for a replacement but in all honesty i have bought 6 2nd cRB26 ranks over the years and all but 2 were no good.

Edited by URAS
  • 5 weeks later...

do not clean off oil if u plan on storing it for awhile. oil will prevent corrosion.

crank is rooted, get another one

take off the two nuts at the end of each conrod, pull the cap off and look at the bearings. make sure u dont mix up nuts or the conrod caps between one another. and note the way they come off becoz they only go back on one way.

im guessing they didnt do a good job with the timing belt. what workshop was it?>

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...