Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

TimeAttackR2.jpg

Phillcom Rally Time Attack Round 2 2010

The Mitsubishi GSR/EVO Club Present Round 2 of the 3 part Phillcom Rally Time Attack Series 2010.

The event will be held at Mallala Motor Sport Park on Sunday 25th July 2010.

The Phillcom Rally Time Attack Round 2 will be limited to ONLY 36 entries, positions are filling fast.

Competition will be based on timed hot laps with ample opportunities to attain a personal best.

The sprint will possess dynamic levels of competition with the introduction of Modification Classes and DOT Tyre Restrictions.

Local Tuner Houses will again battle it out for workshop honours and the outright round win!

Trophies for ALL Classes, privateers are welcome and catered for.

This event is sure to please both competitors and spectators with the best drivers and workshop machines providing non-stop action!

Competitiors must have a minimum L2S or L2SJ CAMS Licence and CAMS Car Club Membership to enter. Click here if you do not have these items.

All Tuner Houses and Businesses are welcome to compete in the Phillcom Rally Time Attack Series 2010. Please contact [email protected] for further details.

For all information on Phillcom Rally Time Attack Round 2 July 25th 2010 please view here.

Time Attack Sponsors

Phillcom Rally

Infinity Signs

Willall Racing

Lakeview Chiropractic

Adelaide Radial Tyre

S & J Automotive

Autosport

Australian Motors Mitsubishi

Phillcom Rally Time Attack Round 2 2010

pdf-med.gifPhillcom Rally Time Attack Round 2 2010 ENTRY FORM

pdf-med.gifPhillcom Rally Time Attack Round 2 2010 SUPP REGS

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/322723-phillcom-rally-time-attack-round-2/
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
I wish I could!! :woot: I'm booked out lol Pics or Ban Roo!! :)

p.s hope you got the front rotors? Will send the rears next week!

Yep got them thanks :D Too bad they're not going on the stag now :P

Lots like I'll be doing the time attack with bog stock brakes ... yay :P

  • 2 weeks later...
Reckon i'll head out for a look and some inspiration

Do you think a black volvo will inspire you? :)

Heading outside now to do some more work on getting the Stagea ready. Calipers finally arrived ... so I might have that brake upgrade sorted afterall. :(

Awesome event, had a blast! Pulled a PB of 1:20.78 in the S14 with stock trim and stock T28BB :-)). Well done to the organisers!

Yep ... very well run event. :)

First time out in the Stagea and I've pulled a PB of 1m32.2s in the Stagea on street tyres. Ended up running consistent 1m33s most of the day, awd power sliding around the circuit, so the limiting factor is not the driver :P Going to sort out the misfire and get better tyres and hope to get into the 1m30s. Finished 7 seconds behind WRXs with semi-slicks :P

I was 8th in the modified class before this event. With my result of 12th in the class (32nd overall out of 36), I hope not to be bumped down the ladder too much :P Damn fat-ass stageas! :P

Glad to hear you had fun! Did you end up getting any footage?

I screwed up the use of the camera a few times, but I'm downloading the vids during my lunch break (in 10 minutes or so) and I hope to post them up.

I'm sure I got the vid of my fastest lap. :)

The Stagea got noticed alot too ... lots of pics taken of the Stag in action (will hit up the photography websites later this week) ... very unusual (apparently) to Time Attack a heavy family wagon :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...