Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://www.police.wa.gov.au/ABOUTUS/News/S...70/Default.aspx

from a leach hwy runner point of view, almost get caught by a radar gun today, someone thought it will be safe if the route not on that list, the fact is, NOT

any bro know is that the radar gun man are totally unpredictable? they just set it at a random place?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/323949-speed-camera-location-is-useful/
Share on other sites

Ok i had to read that a couple of times to decipher it... But after figuring out what i think you are trying to say, you will find that officers on patrol can setup wherever they feel it is likely they will catch speeders, so it is entirely random.

If u click that link at the top and download the "Speed camera locations to 13 June 2010", maybe u will understand what i ve said....

just want to say i totally forgot there is a radar gun man exist and almost get caught by the radar gun on leach hwy :thumbsup: and remind someone who are using that list as reference...

Speed Camera locations are required to be published, as a notice, because they can't technically take your photo without your permission or notifying you that your picture MAY be taken in a certain area / time. Likewise, red light camera's are sign posted. Speed camera's are MEANT to have a sign before, saying "are you speeding?" (then camera, then sign "anywhere, anytime")

Because handheld radars do not take pictures, they can be set up, anywhere, anytime...without notice or publication.

They're totally random and unpredictable.

The End.

  Nic_A31 said:
Speed Camera locations are required to be published, as a notice, because they can't technically take your photo without your permission or notifying you that your picture MAY be taken in a certain area / time. Likewise, red light camera's are sign posted. Speed camera's are MEANT to have a sign before, saying "are you speeding?" (then camera, then sign "anywhere, anytime")

Because handheld radars do not take pictures, they can be set up, anywhere, anytime...without notice or publication.

They're totally random and unpredictable.

The End.

thanks nic

'handheld radars do not take pictures', so what kind of evidence they use to charge you? or there are a video recorder associate with the radar?

If u run pass a radar at 110mph how can the officer chase you down? or they just let you go (what the..)

have zero knowledge on the radars sorry for asking too much

  Bariskycord said:
ya ignore that plx, i dunno why i wrote in that way......sorry for hurting your brain

It's more the fact that you though you were only able to get caught on those roads listed.

Cops are everywhere, if you think you can wake up in the morning and check that list, and decide you are safe to speed on every road but the ones they say there will be a radar on... you're an idiot.

  Bariskycord said:
If u click that link at the top and download the "Speed camera locations to 13 June 2010", maybe u will understand what i ve said....

just want to say i totally forgot there is a radar gun man exist and almost get caught by the radar gun on leach hwy :D and remind someone who are using that list as reference...

Let's re-write that so people understand.

If you click on that link and download the "Speed Camera Locations to 13 June 2010" you will understand what I have just said....

I just wanted to say I totally forgot there was police with a radar guns and I almost got caught by one on leach hwy, just a reminder for anyone who is using that list...

now was that so hard to write so people could understand? either people are getting dumber and dumber these days that they can't even put a sentence together.

Edited by SexycanI

Cops don't even need to show you a reading on their handheld to issue a fine, and they can issue fines withouth a photo, with their partner present who acts as a witness.

Even without their partner (off duty), cops can still issue arrests and shit.

  SexycanI said:
Let's re-write that so people understand.

If you click on that link and download the "Speed Camera Locations to 13 June 2010" you will understand what I have just said....

I just wanted to say I totally forgot there was police with a radar guns and I almost got caught by one on leach hwy, just a reminder for anyone who is using that list...

now was that so hard to write so people could understand? either people are getting dumber and dumber these days that they can't even put a sentence together.

Lol that is still fail English? :D

Hand-helds are lasers..

In-car are radars.. (similar to multinova but a different band)

The cops don't have to show you the reading on the hand-held but if it's spectacular enough they will.. e.g. when I got done as a P-plater for 115 in a 60, he made me get out and look at the reading.. 115kmh 315m away :D

  Hanaldo said:
Lol that is still fail English? :domokun:

comparing it to his sentence? which one is more understandable?

most threads lately are full of sentences you can't even understand, go back a page and look at CaM!'s thread about Good Cops.

most of the time they show you the readout as it instantly elimates any doubt that you were speeding. they go through plenty of people and probably get lots arguing, so its just easier that way.

at the end of the day, if you want to go out for a thrash, know where you can do it with very little chance of getting caught. dont go winding out 3rd on the freeway in the middle of the day.

  SexycanI said:
comparing it to his sentence? which one is more understandable?

most threads lately are full of sentences you can't even understand, go back a page and look at CaM!'s thread about Good Cops.

come on, we are not having an English exam here do we? take it easy, it is our spare time on the internet who having a little chat

I do apologize for what i wrote at the beginning ;)

  JonnoHR31 said:
most of the time they show you the readout as it instantly elimates any doubt that you were speeding. they go through plenty of people and probably get lots arguing, so its just easier that way.

at the end of the day, if you want to go out for a thrash, know where you can do it with very little chance of getting caught. dont go winding out 3rd on the freeway in the middle of the day.

VERY TRUE

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...