Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the thing is i want the concaved look but not really wanting to have rims sticking out of the guards. i know the back can have 9.5 but the fronts im still deciding if i should get 9.5 +22 or just get 8.5 +30s =\

Stock R34 GT-R offset is 9J +30. Aftermarket GT-R offset for R34 is generally about 10J +20ish.

9.5 +22 will fit the rear okay but if you wanna play it safe in the front then get the 8.5 +30 and run a spacer for your desired offset.

would a 9.5 +30 fit a r34 GTT? the 8.5 doesnt have the concaved face

wei from vision r said a 9.5 +30 wouldnt fit on a gtt so i just wanna see in person what the 8.5 flat face looks like on a car before i decide unless the 8.5 comes in concaved from some companies?

Well it's not as straight forward as that.

What sized tyre are you going to run? How low is your car? How much camber are you running? Are your guards rolled?

What brand of rim is Vision R quoting you on? Is it the Rota's? And what are all of the sizes available?

Edited by -Jimmy-

I have a R34 gtt sedan and I'm running CR Kais 9.5 +30 all round. There is a bit of concave aswell. The fronts stick in just before the guards so pretty flush and the rears are in the guards but I adjusted the rear camber arms so the rears are pretty close to the guards now. I've got the guards semi rolled(only bent in slightly) and is lowered. I will post pics up tomorrow if I remember. Hope this helps a bit.

what ever you do, go concave fronts and rears, even it out instead of concave rears and the fronts are flatface, looks shit in my opinion.

had the choice of running flat face fronts and concave rears on my s15, decided to fork out abit more coin for concave both for a better finish.

Rims = you keep for awhile so you gotta make sure you're happy with it first time around.

IF fronts don't fit? Camber the mutherf*ker until it does.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
    • 9" wheels are a little too wide for a RWD 32. They can fit. People have put R33 GTR wheels on 32s for years and years. But they are a very tight squeeze. This has been known for about 30 years. As I said - there is no difference between a 17 and an 18 in terms of what will fit. The rolling diameter needs to stay about the same as stock - not very much larger. If you increase that, you will start to have problems. If you increae rolling diamater at the same time as yo increase width, you will have problems earlier. as 9" wheels are pushing the boundaries already, you would need to be careful with tyre choice. I would put 8.5s on the front of mine, but would expect problems with 9s.
    • post up screen shots of your injector tables
    • Diagnostic flow for a code 21 says check signal at the ECU pins, on a voltmeter of some kind it should read 0.1V at idle, 0.12V cranking, 0.15-0.25V at 2000 rpm. Check each coil such that +1, -3 is infinite or very high resistance, -3, +2 should do the same. (-1, +3), (+3, -2), (+1, -2), and (-1, +2) should all be somewhere between 0 ohms and high resistance. If you trace the path from the coil pin all the way back to the ECU in the diagram the resistance you measure at the coil vs connected to the harness should be pretty much the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...