Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'll tune it right to the edge on bp98 but not so it knocks.

This is the issue though, this leaves NO room for error. Your fuel pump has a small hickup, the temps increase 5 degrees up from the temperature you tuned it in, your turbo pushing 1-2psi extra on a super cold night, or you run the motor flat stick at 5k for 10 minutes around the track pushing the temps up above anything you ever saw on the dyno, or the fuel is a few octane points lower due to a bad batch and POP GOES YOUR MOTOR because it started detonating due to running lean or the temps/boost being higher than you tuned for.

You need to set up intake temp trim tables and bump the boost up a bit extra and make sure the maps are correct, road tune as well to touch up any odd load points that weren't ever seen on the dyno and even then you would want to still wind it down a bit for safety and longetivity.

You need to cover every single possibility for tuning on the edge if you want the motor to last, or just leave a large safety margin AFR and ignition wise and know that if any of the above happens you will be fine, tuning on the edge is a bad idea.

Edited by Rolls
  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This is the issue though, this leaves NO room for error. Your fuel pump has a small hickup, the temps increase 5 degrees up from the temperature you tuned it in, your turbo pushing 1-2psi extra on a super cold night, or you run the motor flat stick at 5k for 10 minutes around the track pushing the temps up above anything you ever saw on the dyno, or the fuel is a few octane points lower due to a bad batch and POP GOES YOUR MOTOR because it started detonating due to running lean or the temps/boost being higher than you tuned for.

You need to set up intake temp trim tables and bump the boost up a bit extra and make sure the maps are correct, road tune as well to touch up any odd load points that weren't ever seen on the dyno and even then you would want to still wind it down a bit for safety and longetivity.

You need to cover every single possibility for tuning on the edge if you want the motor to last, or just leave a large safety margin AFR and ignition wise and know that if any of the above happens you will be fine, tuning on the edge is a bad idea.

There is no issue. A cold night or more boost will read more air. That's part of the tune. The intake temp will have almost no effect on my tune as I only start tuning when it has completely warmed up. My car is remarkably consistent with its running temp. I will notice lower octane fuel immediately. I always and I mean ALWAYS check my hand controller after any wot usage. I floor it, I check it. If I was to take it onto a track then I would pull a couple of degrees off the whole map and add extra fuel to the whole map to keep the engine temp down. I dont use a dyno to tune as I dont need one. I worked in a dyno shop 11 years ago and know how to tune a car. I dont know all the specifics of every aftermarket ecu but I know mine well enough. I only use a dyno to check load points that would be unsafe to hold on the road. The ecr33 doesn't use an air intake temp sensor. Refer to Pauls pfc faq. Winding stuff down is for people that provide warranties. I dont need an afr margin. That's just a waste of fuel. I agree with you on leaving some ignition safety. Although that safety is only 1 degree. I'm talking from experience here, not repeating anothers words.

1 degree isn't much.

After my car had been tuned I did a road tune to get it 100% with someone listening with knock ears. It was a 28c day, not exactly hot and we gave it a bit of a beating then left it idling in traffic for about 5-10 minutes, then we revved out 3rd on the freeway, pinged its tits off, had to pull 3 degrees from peak torque to stop it doing it.

If you have some sort of knock equipment and actively monitor it then sure, go for gold, just don't set and forget it. If you are pulling a few degrees and adding fuel when racing then that is what I was talking about, leaving a margin for error.

1 degree isn't much.

After my car had been tuned I did a road tune to get it 100% with someone listening with knock ears. It was a 28c day, not exactly hot and we gave it a bit of a beating then left it idling in traffic for about 5-10 minutes, then we revved out 3rd on the freeway, pinged its tits off, had to pull 3 degrees from peak torque to stop it doing it.

If you have some sort of knock equipment and actively monitor it then sure, go for gold, just don't set and forget it. If you are pulling a few degrees and adding fuel when racing then that is what I was talking about, leaving a margin for error.

One degree doesn't sound like much but it raises my knock level significantly. I haven't checked lately but it used to raise it about 30 points on my pfc. I hear ya tho. I'm only using the knock sensors on the motor for monitoring knock. They do pick up other sounds for sure but always pick up knock in my car. If you let your car get very hot and heat soaked then you will need to let it cool down or it will knock as you saw. I haven't had my car in summer yet (I only bought it about 6 months ago) but I will be adjusting the tune for the warmer months. I gave it a couple of speed runs once and it got to 85 degrees. It normally sits on 70 and doesn't budge around town. Setting and forgetting is the last thing I would do unless I pulled timing and added fuel. But then it would be slow :(:P

  • 1 month later...

Nothing too exciting really but what the hell. So I got it up and running. Garrett GT3582r, 6boost manifold, 50mm Turbosmart wastgate, Kando Dynamic braided oil and water lines. I ended up getting a 4 inch to 3 inch silicon reducer and putting the afm in front of the turbo for now.

I took it for a little test drive with no dump to check for leaks etc. I'm getting the dump made on Tuesday. I modified the stock "J" pipe so I can use the stock bov and the other fittings on it. There is a slight issue with reversion but I will get that sorted over the next week or so.

As far as spool up goes it is not nearly as bad as some people think. I saw 2 psi at 2000rpm and 4 psi at 2500rpm. I have it at gate pressure for now which is 17psi. I saw full boost at about 4500 at just over half throttle. It might be different with the exhaust hooked up tho. There definitely is bugger all under 4000rpm. For normal driving it is fine and I have a nice turbo whine instead of constant bov noise from the stock turbo.

Bloody intercooler piping popped off in 4 different locations. After I did one up tighter, a different one popped off. No biggy tho. I just need to file some grip into the ends of the pipes. I haven't floored it yet as the wideband isn't in there and the intercooler pipes kept coming off. Just before the last time I fixed the pipes to bring it back to the shed I drove down the road at about 3 quarter throttle. There was no grip in 2nd coming on boost and 3rd pulls harder than 2nd used to. It briefly spun the tyres in 3rd coming onto boost....then the intercooler pipe came off glare.gif

The wheel are stock for now hence the lack of grip but I have some 6 spoke 19inch lenso's to go on there when I get around to it. I don't drive flat out very often (once quick squirt a day) so stock wheels are ok for now.

I'll post a short video next weekend when the dump is on the car. I still have to look at the tune (only 14 knock so far) so once it is all sweet and checked on the dyno I'll make a nice long vid.

One degree doesn't sound like much but it raises my knock level significantly. I haven't checked lately but it used to raise it about 30 points on my pfc. I hear ya tho. I'm only using the knock sensors on the motor for monitoring knock. They do pick up other sounds for sure but always pick up knock in my car. If you let your car get very hot and heat soaked then you will need to let it cool down or it will knock as you saw. I haven't had my car in summer yet (I only bought it about 6 months ago) but I will be adjusting the tune for the warmer months. I gave it a couple of speed runs once and it got to 85 degrees. It normally sits on 70 and doesn't budge around town. Setting and forgetting is the last thing I would do unless I pulled timing and added fuel. But then it would be slow :(:P

If you have an aftermarket ECU that has aux inputs get an intake air temp sensor and set up a timing vs air temp trim table, it will save your motor if you go flog it at 20psi on a 40c day after sitting in traffic.

If you have an aftermarket ECU that has aux inputs get an intake air temp sensor and set up a timing vs air temp trim table, it will save your motor if you go flog it at 20psi on a 40c day after sitting in traffic.

Yes you are right. I already knew that. I have a power fc that has one map for ignition and one for fuel. I can pull timing from the map vs coolant temp using a datalogit if I like. It is set now so the timing stays the same no matter how hot it runs. If I ever run the engine up to 100 degrees I would set the car up before doing so.

I liked your comment on hydraulic lifters earlier thumbsup.gif We learn something new every day, even me yes.gif

Coolant temp is better than nothing, but air intake temp is far more important. You could have a fantastic cooling system that works great on a 40c day and coolant temps only rise slightly, air temps however will soar.

If it is all you have then certainly utilise it, but if you can somehow set up an intake air temp sensor that would be even better.

As you guys may already know the R33 doesn't have an air intake sensor in the stock computer or the power fc. If I got nistune on a different computer then I could set up the air temp compensation. Another thing I thought of is putting an aftermarket gauge from the coolant sensor and using that to keep an eye on the coolant temp. Then I could run another sensor in the piping and run that to the coolant sensor wire from the ecu. Then I would get a readout at the hand controller of the intake air temp. I could then setup the "coolant temp vs ign timing" in the ecu as it would now be adjusting to the intake air temp and not the coolant temp. I have a air intake sensor in the shed so I might give it a try.

Yeh not sure how you would do it with a PFC. With NIStune it's as simple as getting a data acquisition cable which interfaces with NIStune and allows you to monitor 8 external channels.

Maybe I didn't explain clearly enough in the last post. The R33 doesn't have an air intake sensor. Even with nistune I would still have to put a sensor in there.

What I was saying is that I could add a temp sensor to the intake and feed that signal to the coolant channel in the power fc. Then I could pull timing based on that.

I would have to disconnect the coolant sensor from the pfc and run an aftermarket temp gauge to keep an eye on coolant temps.

Lol no I know man, that's what I was saying. With NIStune it's as simple as getting a DAQ cable and a sensor, would cost about $50 all up. No messing around with rewiring things to 'trick' the ecu.. Thinking of doing it myself actually, will get an EGT probe as well. Would like to have some way to monitor it without having the laptop in the car though, thats the only downside.

Not arguing or anything here lol, just thought I would contribute to the discussion :)

Then I could run another sensor in the piping and run that to the coolant sensor wire from the ecu. Then I would get a readout at the hand controller of the intake air temp. I could then setup the "coolant temp vs ign timing" in the ecu as it would now be adjusting to the intake air temp and not the coolant temp. I have a air intake sensor in the shed so I might give it a try.

i hope your joking? theres a reason the ecu has its own coolant temp sender...

Not expensive or hard to set up an intake air temp sensor either. There's a thread about it on the NIStune website.

Didn't think many of the nissan ECUs had support for intake air temp trim?

edit: I read up and saw that you can do it via an external channel, thats interesting.

I did a search over there but couldn't find the thread though, any help?

Edited by Rolls

Didn't think many of the nissan ECUs had support for intake air temp trim?

edit: I read up and saw that you can do it via an external channel, thats interesting.

I did a search over there but couldn't find the thread though, any help?

Yeh man, in the general section. Thread called "guide to cheap DIY data logging". Think it's on the second page now.

i hope your joking? theres a reason the ecu has its own coolant temp sender...

I'll try it and see how it goes. If it doesn't work then I've lost nothing. If it does then no worries. I think I did convert it then the readout wouldn't be that different anyway. Now it reads 70degrees most of the time. I would expect the air temp to read about 40 degrees most of the time. When I flog it then it will get hotter and pull timing. It wont make any difference to cold starting because I would just "zero" the necessary water temp settings.

Give us your 2 cents tho mate and put some detail into it.

Lol no I know man, that's what I was saying. With NIStune it's as simple as getting a DAQ cable and a sensor, would cost about $50 all up. No messing around with rewiring things to 'trick' the ecu.. Thinking of doing it myself actually, will get an EGT probe as well. Would like to have some way to monitor it without having the laptop in the car though, thats the only downside.

Not arguing or anything here lol, just thought I would contribute to the discussion :)

I wasn't having a go Martin, I just thought you didn't understand what I meant biggrin.gif

I'll try it and see how it goes. If it doesn't work then I've lost nothing. If it does then no worries. I think I did convert it then the readout wouldn't be that different anyway. Now it reads 70degrees most of the time. I would expect the air temp to read about 40 degrees most of the time. When I flog it then it will get hotter and pull timing. It wont make any difference to cold starting because I would just "zero" the necessary water temp settings.

Assuming there is no way to use the extra sensors to create a map that has timing vs sensor-x then that is actually a really good idea, if there is then using the extra inputs would be the better way.

How detrimental would not having cold start enrichment be though? I guess the main issue would be to find an air intake temp sensor that uses the same voltage range as the water temp sender, wouldn't be too hard to create an equivalent table to figure out how to set up the map though.

Might speak to pete see if he thinks it is feasible when I get my tune fixed up in a week or so, as with the huge difference between a 10c night in winter and a 40c day in summer I really would like to have intake air temp correction.

Edited by Rolls

can you set up say an ignition trim table vs the air temp though?

This is something I'm still looking into, I believe you can on some ECU's but not all of them http://forum.nistune.com/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=857

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...