Jump to content
SAU Community

Wheels/rims Question, Need Help :/

Garth

By Garth,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Garth Apprentice

Garth

Posted
Posted

Okay I'm looking for a 5/6 spoke racing wheels for my N/A R34 coupe, I have found several and currently choosing between varrstoen 2.2.1 and the rota grid and GTR'D/P45R but I'm having trouble picking one due size and fitments, I want P45R's but I want to go 18's but the only available width's are 9.5 and 10.5 at 12+ offset which apparently sit outside the guards which I do not want I want to keep it flush and lined up inside the guard, NOW I've been told that it can be down the back ones will sit in but it's just the front 2 wheels which will need camber arrangements and guard rolling but it'll still sit outside??? the guard..I just need some inform and recommended sizes and fitments?

But the rota girds would fit perfectly fine because they have sizes available 18's by 8.5 with offsets from 12+ to 30+ which will fit fine but my only concern is that the spoke style is a little aggressive for an R34 25GT opinions would be awesome?> if any one has them maybe a photo?

and my last question is the Varrstoen 2.2.1 they only have 18 by 9.5 but the offsets go from 12+ to i think 30+ which to what I think the wheels will sit inside the guard fine or the camber/tyre will need to adjusted?

In the end I want that concave dish fill like with te37's on a GTR R34

cheers thank you

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/410694-wheelsrims-question-need-help/
Share on other sites
Captain Natro Grand Master

Captain Natro

Posted
Posted

thanks, I've been told koya drift tek 18 by 8.5 front and 9.5 rear with with 18+ offset fits flush and looks wicked

+18 with a 9.5 inch rim will be seriously pushing it on a 34, would like good with some guard work and camber.

I have 17x9" rims on my 33 and with +28 the sit quite well, with a 9.5 inch rim that makes it the equivalent of +40ish to sit the same... So anything under Probley a +25/30 will be pushing it.

(better yet borrow ur mates rims, test fit, profit lol)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • GTSBoy
      DeAgostini 1/8 scale BNR32 Nissan Skyline GT-R Nismo

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That's hilariously putrid!
    • GTSBoy
      R33 Fuel Pump & Brakes after alarm swap

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...