Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

not in australia. basically anything more reflective than ordinary glass, unless you have a license for it is illegal. You basically put it on and hope you don't get caught :) Although I'm told you can use reflective tint in some areas of the car legally. Not sure.

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

im a window tinter, tint all day everyday... reflective tint is completly illegel, laws about cant have darker then 35% is all bullshit, have wat u want, reason being if they defect u, they have to prove to u right there and then its illegel, ie a uv meter, and then IF they have one u have the right to ask when it was callibrated.. they have to be re callibrated after every use or something silly like that... anyways i drive a r33 5% sides and rear 15% front screen, cant see in at all, been pulled over no hassels, basically comes down to drive like a dickhead and u will get defected.. with the film advertised for sale, could i grab a brand name off ya and what film is it? eg johnson?? sp?? es?? kolon?? polystar?? mep??

im a window tinter, tint all day everyday... reflective tint is completly illegel, laws about cant have darker then 35% is all bullshit, have wat u want, reason being if they defect u, they have to prove to u right there and then its illegel, ie a uv meter, and then IF they have one u have the right to ask when it was callibrated.. they have to be re callibrated after every use or something silly like that... anyways i drive a r33 5% sides and rear 15% front screen, cant see in at all, been pulled over no hassels, basically comes down to drive like a dickhead and u will get defected.. with the film advertised for sale, could i grab a brand name off ya and what film is it?  eg johnson?? sp?? es?? kolon?? polystar?? mep??

Its Sunguard if i'm not wrong. Printed made in USA.

  • 1 month later...
im a window tinter, tint all day everyday... reflective tint is completly illegel, laws about cant have darker then 35% is all bullshit, have wat u want, reason being if they defect u, they have to prove to u right there and then its illegel, ie a uv meter, and then IF they have one u have the right to ask when it was callibrated.. they have to be re callibrated after every use or something silly like that... anyways i drive a r33 5% sides and rear 15% front screen, cant see in at all, been pulled over no hassels, basically comes down to drive like a dickhead and u will get defected.. with the film advertised for sale, could i grab a brand name off ya and what film is it?  eg johnson?? sp?? es?? kolon?? polystar?? mep??

how do you pass pink slips then ? im fffffff think i may have to pull it off ;(

Is there enough film there to do a JZA80 Supra? (Im mainly concented about the rear windscreen as its pretty big!)

JZA80 not sure what model that is, but if thats the newer model shape, u need the rear to be atleast 35" high, tinted one on the weekend actually!, or u can do it in 2 pieces if u wish (BODGY!)

JZA80 not sure what model that is, but if thats the newer model shape, u need the rear to be atleast 35" high, tinted one on the weekend actually!, or u can do it in 2 pieces if u wish (BODGY!)

For the rear, I have 38" high.

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...