Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone had any experience with the new Wolf 3d V4?

The guys at Per4Manz here in Perth swear they can get better results, quicker and significantly cheaper than a PowerFC based solution with this setup.

The unit has inbuilt boost control, MAP sensor, thermal compensation, closed loop support, full realtime mapping and good PC software etc..

Anyone used one of these systems, or even the older V3?

Any info would be appreciated.

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4812-wolf-3d-v4/
Share on other sites

Originally posted by slayer

Anyone had any experience with the new Wolf 3d V4?

The guys at Per4Manz here in Perth swear they can get better results, quicker and significantly cheaper than a PowerFC based solution with this setup.

The unit has inbuilt boost control, MAP sensor, thermal compensation, closed loop support, full realtime mapping and good PC software etc..

Conrad

The old wolf systems were ok.

I would not believe that with a hand-controller and PFC for $1600odd is going to be more expensive to setup than a new Wolf, considering the extra labour cost involved with the re-wiring needed on the wolf (PFC bolts straight in).

As far as quicker to setup, again if we start timing from the opening of the 'box' ,no way. Then again if you aren't much chop tuning the PFC the wolf could be faster once plugged in.

Better results ? Yes the wolf has more customisable MAPs, in theory you can get greater tuning resolution out of it. However I think the PFC has twice as many points as are necessary to get a decent tune. IF you use every single point you will spend alot of dyno time money. Another thing worth considering is the retention of the AFM, its a good thing on a road car. The response of the AFM is superior to a MAP sensor and will show itself in the fuel ecconomy and bottom end response.

Also the boost control option on the wolf (like a number of other systems) is pretty crap, you should consider an EBC even if you end up getting it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4812-wolf-3d-v4/#findComment-74604
Share on other sites

Originally posted by rev210

Another thing worth considering is the retention of the AFM, its a good thing on a road car. The response of the AFM is superior to a MAP sensor and will show itself in the fuel ecconomy and bottom end response.

Got some more info on this rev210? I always though MAP was better than AFM because it didn't restrict air flow (and you can BOV to atmo if you are into that sort of thing).

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4812-wolf-3d-v4/#findComment-74817
Share on other sites

Hmm interesting - there is so many opinions as to which is better for a daily driver out there, I dont know who to believe...

The arguments for the Wolf included that is has closed loop support so it provides good off-boost fuel economy and throttle response.

The other point the tuner raised was the inability to accurately (or quickly) tune the PFC due to the handset programming..he suggested a number of engines around town had been fried due to the dyno time required to dial in a PFC correctly.

I really dont know which way to go on this - the Wolf can be fitted with boost control and dyno time for $1600, using a baseline map they have developed previously on their own R33, the PFC SECOND HAND is $1600 PLUS boost controller option seperate, and then dyno time.

Plus it supports temperature compensation and other niceties, which the PFC doesnt fully.

I like the fact the Wolf 3d support deceleration fueling (the Link in my WRX didnt and you almost bounced off the windscreen when coming off the throttle) which goes some way to smoothing oout the driving experience.

As far as MAP sensors.. I thought this was the preferred option - or is it only preferred for pure power output, and not the street drivability??

I am in Perth, so the tuning options are limited - Per4Manz seem to have a good rep as far as tuning, but I know I can use Brett from PSI Performance with the PFC too..

The PFC is the preferred option by most R33 owners, I guess there is reasoning behind this.

Anyone in Perth got either systems fitted that can take me for a spin to get a feel for the drivability?

Conrad

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4812-wolf-3d-v4/#findComment-74973
Share on other sites

iv got the Wolf3D version4 Plug in and Play for the R33 GTSt

couldnt be more happier, paid $1600 including hand controller..thats also including some extra tuning from base map

has a heap of features many which pFC dont support

unfortunantly, im in melbourne...feel free to PM me any questions

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4812-wolf-3d-v4/#findComment-75088
Share on other sites

The Wolf and the PFC aren't the only systems out there.

The e-manage gives both a run for the money, the cost is about the same as the Wolf (PC or E-01 controller tune). The E-01 is a fantastic boost cont its own.

Nengun is the place to buy the Greddy e-manage and E-01 from at the best price.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/4812-wolf-3d-v4/#findComment-75162
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • That looks good, but I think you're going to need much beefier side skirts now.
    • They are daft and there's a reason it never caught on. Steering feel? We don't need no stinking steering feel!
    • I gotta pull you up on this. It's driving me crazy. A shutter is something that closes, like over a window or in a cmera. The word you want is shudder. That LSD is clearly f**ked. Take it to a diff shop and get it disassembled and examined by an expert. YOu might have plates welded together or something equally crazy.
    • Define "starting to fail". Wy not just rebuild them?
    • Check the Nistune doco. There are a few assumptions being made here that might not be valid. I will list the things that occur to me: Base map. Base map for what? Base map for Z32? Then the cranking pulse width is probably wrong for an RB25. The extra 500cc of capacity might well be enough to prevent it from catching. Base map for RB25? I don't think you can load one of those into a Z32. You have to just make the settings correct for an RB25 in the Z32 base map. That is either K or the TIM to get the pulsewidth right. Loom. You bought a loom for an RB. And you plugged it into a Z32 ECU. Did you make sure that any iwre differences were swapped. From memory, there's at least a couple. And as per the others, I would suggest making sure that the fuel pressure is correct while cranking and that the injectors are actually flowing as expected. They really must come out and go on the bench, unless you do find that you have messed up as per above points. I would also suggest watching in Nistune to make sure that everything is reading correctly. That the correct binary flags are raised at the right time (like the crank signal), that there's no stupid values in K or TIM. That you have not got mismatched firmware for the ECU and/or a wrong image loaded.
×
×
  • Create New...