Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I posted this in the general automotive section but don't really know if that was the right place, so I am posting here again for our local "SAFC hero" ;)

I was having some trouble with the wiring on my AFM plug. There was a dodgy connection somewhere in there which was causing the AFM to die whilst driving along and essentially cutting power cause the ECU thought it was getting no air. So, being the dodgy bastard I am (that's right...not just lazy...I am a man of many talents :D), I decided to remove the plug altogether and just hook the 4 wires up to some female spade connectors (if that makes sense).

When connecting back to the AFM I got 2 of the wires mixed up and managed to blow the fuse that the SAFCII get it's power from. The car would turn over, but wouldn't start. It took me a few hours and a couple of rewiring attempts, including pulling the AFM plug apart and soldering the wires back in to realise where the problem was.

I replaced the blown fuse and the car fired up fine and all the reading from the SAFC seem to be fine.

The problem now is that when I turn the car off, the SAFC STAYS ON and I have to pull the fuse (the one that blew before) to get it to turn off.

I suppose I could do some more dodgy wiring to get around the problem, but I was wondering if anyone with some auto electrical experience or someone who is fairly familiar with the installation and functions of SAFCII's could point me in the right direction.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49439-safc-hero-needed/
Share on other sites

Nope....the only wires that I fiddled with were the 4 wires that go to the AFM....

Do you reckon there would be a relay somewhere in the 12V line that would, if blown, cause the SAFC to exhibit this sorta problem....just a stab in the dark, cause I have NFI:rolleyes:

Did I mention how much I hate auto electrical stuff....:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49439-safc-hero-needed/#findComment-987344
Share on other sites

The relay could have welded the contacts together when you, erm, "****ed up". A dead short on a 12v system draws enormous current (which you can literally weld with) which would quite easily cause the contacts to melt together.

It seems strange the SAFC is stuck on, but nothing else on your accessories circuit? If its a relay inside the SAFC itself, its time to go digging with a soldering iron :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49439-safc-hero-needed/#findComment-988573
Share on other sites

Thanks Andrew....here's a funny thing though.....Turn ignition off, SAFC stays on...so I pull the fuse and the SAFC turns off, but I put the fuse straight back in and the SAFC stays off until I turn the ignition back on.....

any ideas?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49439-safc-hero-needed/#findComment-989096
Share on other sites

but I haven't touched the SAFC or ECU wiring...how could it have just suddenly happened???

For the moment I have have wired a switch to the fuse concerned and have to turn the switch off and then on each time I turn the car off.

Interestingly when I turn the switch off I hear a click from the ECU area which sounds the same as the noise which used to come from there when I turned the ignition off before this problem started.....this is what makes me think it's a relay problem...but as I said I have NFI when it comes to auto electrics :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49439-safc-hero-needed/#findComment-989112
Share on other sites

OK... My bad... I just reread what you've typed... My understanding now is this...

- You didn't touch any of the wiring going into the ECU... Ever...

- You played around with the AFM plug / wiring until you ****ed it...

- You fixed the AFM plug / wiring...

- Now the SAFC and EBC are borked...

Correct?

The SAFC and EBC both get there power from the ECU, so, I'm assuming you blew the ECU fuse?

It's sounding like a relay problem... Go find that click from the ECU area and replace the relay you find...

If it still does it, you've accidently rewired something to be permanently ground or permanently 12V+

P.S. Never play with auto electrics again... :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49439-safc-hero-needed/#findComment-989424
Share on other sites

1. Correcto...me no touchy touch any other wiring apart from the AFM

2. I will try to track down a relay in the vicinity of the clicky noise

3. If I didn't have to I would never have touched anything electrical.....I'd rather have teeth pulled :)

4. Thanks for the help :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/49439-safc-hero-needed/#findComment-989491
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...