Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

u bet, 1st day i have off, headunit will be installed (hopefully headrest TV's and 2nd DVD player + PS2)

aswell as me lowering that baby to the ground.. mm 4cm off the ground *drools*

guess ill have to make that exhaust abit louder too *pulls out drill* j/k

when you lower a car too much, you reduce the suspension travel, thus resulting in reduced performance of the car.

Exactly, Nissan designed the Stagea to operate within certain heights, you can lower it a fair bit. But once you get to slamming height;

1. There is no travel left to absorb bumps, it hops from bump to bump. This means no steering, no braking and no traction to accelerate.

2. It hits the bump stops regularly, this means a harsh, uncomfortable ride. Add that to the most likely excessively high Japanese spring rates and you have a Stagea that no one will want to ride in.

3. Because of the Nissan design paramteters, the suspension geometry goes all to pieces, it will have too much negative camber and wear out the tyres fast. You will have silly stuff like 245 mm wide tyres with only 185 mm touching the ground. This means no steering, no braking and no traction to accelerate.

4. The drive shafts will be at excessive angles this means they soak up lots of extra power, this means slower acceleration.

That's why we say LOW IS SLOW

:P cheers:)

PS; I came back because I couldn't stand the thought of a slammed Stagea with 250 4wkw killing people because it wouldn't go around corners, won't stop and starts flying through the air at the smallest bump. We have lost too many Skyline owners to that mentality.

well more of what i was saying is, when i get home, im going to slam it to see how pimp it looks.. then raise it so i can get out of my driveway....just so that should mean instead of the car being @ 20cm off ground, maybe 8-10cm :) we shall see

701%204.jpg

^^ thats worse than 4wd :)

Measure the height, centre of wheel to guard. Standard is around 385 mm front and 375 mm rear, that is around 5mm lower than brand new. The lowest you want to go and keep some suspension travel and sensible geometry is ~350 mm front and ~340 mm rear.

:) cheers :)

PS; That is what mine is in the pictures

Mine is about that height too SK, it looks a lot better but still handles well enough.

I have a bad problem with camber, as i'm running a whiteline camber kit, but it's still about -1.5 degrees out. the guy i went to said he can put some adjustable camber bars or some such thing in, apparently he said they use them in race cars to negate the rear camber. fully adjustable setup.

tough as a bowl of custard! nah just kidding thats an awesome colour, id buy it anyday. an S2, aswell. Was thinking about 34 taillights for mine, but you'd have to split them in half, i think...

another body mod to think about - suicide doors for the back. gangster caddy style. if your going to airbag it, go some spinners. not my style, but if your gonna go halfway, might as well go the rest.

ps mine sits more NAVARA than stagea too - seriously after some suspension. just a hassle getting it.

im going for a more function over form approach atm. get it going quick, handling well, and stopping when i tell it to, THEN ill worry about how pretty and babe pulling it is.

Edited by qikstagea
Mine is about that height too SK, it looks a lot better but still handles well enough.

I have a bad problem with camber, as i'm running a whiteline camber kit, but it's still about -1.5 degrees out. the guy i went to said he can put some adjustable camber bars or some such thing in, apparently he said they use them in race cars to negate the rear camber. fully adjustable setup.

I am a bit confused, sorry I need some help;

1.Is that front or rear camber?

2. What does "-1.5 degree out" mean? The recommended rear setting is 0.25 to 0.5 degrees negative, so is yours 2.0 degrees negative? The recommended front setting is 0.5 to 1.0 degree negative, so is yours 2.5 degrees negative?

3. If front, you must have something bent, 2.5 degrees is unreachable with the camber adjusters set on max positive adjustment (regardless of how low it is). Best to find out what is bent rather than patch it up with spherical jointed arms.

3. If rear, you need 2 camber kits. One for the inner upper on the control arm and one for the outer upper. The outer bush is in the upright (hub), so has to be removed unless the workshop has a special tool for removing the bush while the upright is still in the car.

This thread explains why I don't recommend using spherical joints in road cars.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/in...64&hl=spherical

:P cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid

Sorry. it's rear camber. i must have said that a bit odd, sorry not a suspension mechanic. i meant it was at -1.5 degrees on the rear, even after i'd had a camber kit installed on it.

maybe i just need to get another camber kit installed, i'm not sure if i did get 1 or 2 put on originally, but the guy i got to install it knows his stuff, so i'd assume he's tried everything to get it straight.

My car arrived last night, its much lower than I first anticipated...Scraped it a few times already, exhaust sits very low. The ride is fantastic! Very firm, is that how they are supposed to be standard?

My car arrived last night, its much lower than I first anticipated...Scraped it a few times already, exhaust sits very low. The ride is fantastic! Very firm, is that how they are supposed to be standard?

What are the centre of wheel to guard measurements?

Should be around 385 mm minimum on the front, if lower than that chances are they not standard Stagea springs.

:D cheers :D

i think u might have aftermarket if its sitting low :D

which would explain why its hard.

not going spinners on my stagea. not my type either

suicide doors sound pimp and i want NOWW!!

i think ill organise rims, stereo, airbags, powermods, then suicide doors.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well you could certainly buy or build an enclosure for a pod in that corner of the bay. It is absolutely vital that there is a nice big opening to let cold air in to it from the front or underside, otherwise it will just pull air in around the edges from the bay, and if that air is hot, you gain nothing from enclosing the pod. There is lots of good evidence around (including on here, see posts by @Kinkstaah for example) showing that pods pulling hot air from the bay is only a problem when you're static or slow in traffic, and that as soon as you get the car up and moving the air being grabbed by the pod cools down. Although that will obviously vary from car to car, whether there is a flow of cold air to the pod or if it all has to come through the radiator area, etc etc. Obviously, the whole exercise requires as much thought as anything else does. Doing the lazy thing will often end up being the dumb thing. The stock GTT airbox has a cold air snorkel to feed it from over the radiator. Shows that Nissan were thinking. The GT airbox is upside down compared to the turbo one, yeah? Inlet at the bottom, AFM/exit on the lid? That might make it harder to route the turbo inlet pipe using the GT airbox than a turbo one. That would probably be the main reason I'd consider not using it, not that it is too small and restrictive. I'm looking at a photo of one now and the inlet opening seems nice and large. Also seems to have the same type of snorkel that the turbo one has. Maybe all that's required is to make a less restrictive snorkel/cold air inlet, perhaps by punching down through the guard like I did.
    • Also seen this as an option 
    • I get you, we’ll see I’m aiming for 200ish kw now and hopefully 300rwkw down the line after some upgrades maybe like headstuds, E85 flex fuel etc  so trying to make it final for that now, I can get a GTT airbox for $280 so it’s not too bad but not sure if there’s better ways to spend that money. I seen online they say pod filter which isn’t enclosed isn’t good especially for a plus T.      hard to say what to do
    • Meh. How much power can you make from a +T anyway? I wouldn't have though it would be enough to challenge the airbox. It's not as if it's tiny compared with the turbo one. As to putting a pod in a stock airbox .... it's not the filter element that would be restrictive. It would be the air inlet to the box that would be the narrow point, which you could open up regardless of what element was inside. On my R32 I opened up the sort of triangular opening in the bottom front corner of the box, deformed (heated, moulded) some 4" stormwater pipe to fit to that opening and punched a 4" hole down through the inner guard to the spot where the stock intercooler used to be. This was purely in the search for a cold intake, but you could do something similar if you need to open up the inlet side of it. The AFM tube size is the same for both NA and turbo, so the outlet from the airbox is same same anyway. If you're going to do the right thing, then an aftermarket ECU won't care about the AFM (ie, you can get rid of it). But even if it was still there, people pull >300rwkW through them all day, and I suspect you won't be going there.
    • R34 RB25de Neo by the way ^ 
×
×
  • Create New...