V8skylineMAN

ONe is plenty.

Have you tried said flavour combination? I thought as much. Cease and desist from your derogatory assault on the Councils timtams

(im in)

Chilli me biatch!.....and put some stank on it!

Is that pronounced the same as schitthaus?...arent all airports chitose?

Why thankyou, kind Sir, your not so bad yourself.

I hereby wish to view this aforesaid inapproprate media. Wherewith shall i procure this MPG script?

I move that we post meaninless senate drivel in every forum on SAU. All in favour, say aye

meh

lmao. rofl. pmsl, et al Oooh my belly hurts

5am starts - WOOT!

mornin whores

/me throws up.

Having gone through some of the legal discussions over what finality and certainty mean, I understand that point. If we are looking, as we are, to get guidance from SAU Heirachy on basic principles, not the details in terms of the basic principles — I think everybody understands that in negotiations details are as details become — would you not agree that finality and certainty are concepts that people understand in regular language?

lead the way strutto

What is our position on the question? Given the above, the SAU Chamber of Commerce believes that the only questions that could be valid for a referendum are those surrounding the issues of process. Even then, the questions would have to be so broad as to provide only the most general of guidelines for government. We, in fact, can see only one real question that can give government strong guidance from the public, and that question would simply be: is the process working?

First, there are some serious challenges facing this process, Mr Smoothline The first one, in our view, is the fear factor. SAU negotiations and Constituants rights are extremely sensitive issues. A referendum that relates to such issues is fraught with the danger that it could act as a lightning rod for unjustified animosity and negativity toward SAUl people who are trying to resolve the issue surrounding their status as Queenslanders. This concern alone presents a great challenge to government. They must consider only questions that will not foment discontent and fear.

Thank you very much, Mr Strutto. Can I thank you, firstly, for inviting us here this afternoon to have a look at the proposals that we are putting forward for our primary legislation at the earliest opportunity and for allowing us to do a presentation. I do not think I have heard of a Select Committee having a presentation like this before. I am sure somebody is going to put me right on that. But as I know that you are at the cutting edge in these particular issues on scrutiny and we as a Department like to think ourselves likewise, I thought it would be helpful just to go through the proposals we are making and to very briefly describe what we think they are going to do. Could I stress as well that these are proposals and why we wanted them considered by the Select Committee is because I am hopeful, in fact I am confident, that the Select Committee will be able t make recommendations that we will hear before the legislation starts its progress through Parliament. Of course, it is not unique but it is unusual that that happens to legislation. My view is that we will have better legislation for it having been seen by a Select Committee before it actually goes formally through the House.

Nexus9..............what the F*&k are you supposed to be?

WTF ! AARRRGGHH! Im HIDEOUS!! Wise guys, ay?

They might have had the larger engine for the same reason that USA get 2.4's in their 180SX's Just a thought.

should work pretty well as far as i can see... but if you blow it up, I dint say a thing

Just a thought? is it your alarm system playing up? they have a dedicated indicator relay in them(most times)

N00bS You will find that most of the "dumb" comments are from people that have just joined and arent up to speed on what cars have what distinguishing features.

Waking up early on a Sunday is so much of teh suck that it is beyond being sucky.