Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You're wrong (as usual) :)

The PFC is a standalone ECU. It does other things besides control timing (ITC) and fueling (afc).

Btw: You're the one with the fancy AVC-R, enough blue to hold a disco. Not to mention your ful sic bro head unit

Teeheehee

P.S. Third place my ass, bitch :D

Originally posted by uLa32

hehehe :)

the equivalent of a pfc with the boost solenoid would be an s-afc, s-itc and an avc-r piggy backed off the std ecu right? (correct me if wrong). seems a bit messy for me and you got enough blue screens in there to light up a whole cabin. ;)

i say get a pfc... probably the most easiest to install and tune and it doesnt affect your wiring loom. and its hidden behind the passenger kick panel so you cant see it anyway.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/2/#findComment-160974
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Originally posted by rs73

Hi Denham,

Yea I do remember him...

Did he has a power chip installed? I thought his car was worked by APS somewhere in Bayswater area, with Chiptorque computer and he some FMIC...

I'm not sure which dyno power chip based their reading on, but I'm planning to get PowerFC anyway, so it won't bother me much :D

Rianto

He had a powerchip and fmic and had all thw work done at the chip place, which bullshitted him about his power figure.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/2/#findComment-160981
Share on other sites

Just finished the final tune of a TSI on a R32 gts-t. It made 218rwkw at 19psi with a conservative tune since it is a daily driver. The car has GTR 440cc injectors of different impedance to the original jets yet the TSI has no problems with this since it has it’s own injector drivers. I will post up a graph tomorrow with the final power pull.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/2/#findComment-161225
Share on other sites

bah! its a factory fitment bro! heh

third place indeed.............. indeed..... heh

Originally posted by poyz

You're wrong (as usual) :D

The PFC is a standalone ECU. It does other things besides control timing (ITC) and fueling (afc).  

Btw: You're the one with the fancy AVC-R, enough blue to hold a disco. Not to mention your ful sic bro head unit

Teeheehee

P.S. Third place my ass, bitch :rolleyes:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/2/#findComment-162379
Share on other sites

Factory fitment my SDBC/GT2530/FMIC/Bosch 975 indeed!

Third place...pfft...dyno tune at Croydon in less than a months time. I'll be spanking your 12.7 effort more so than I already am :D

Originally posted by uLa32

bah! its a factory fitment bro! heh

third place indeed.............. indeed..... heh

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/2/#findComment-162731
Share on other sites

Must be all that ricey blue...

Me and Ula have been pulled over at the Ring Road for racing/dangerous driving/speeding (you name it) ... we over took an unmarked car at speed limiter. Took us a while to notice him.

Of course Ula was behind when this took place (had to add it Ula!)

Till this day, no fine/court order in the mail. The policeman said to me. Now now, this ain't no racing car and you're not a race car driver. Whereas Ula got threatened with a court order.

Must be a skyline/pig thing. Sucks to be a skyline driver when cops are on the prowl (ie at Melbourne).

As for that sticker coming off tonight, whats the bet it goes back on sometime soon :lol:

Originally posted by INASNT

mine road legal just not pig legal accoding to them!

the sticker comes off tonight! :D

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/2/#findComment-163110
Share on other sites

Sure is a trolley.

A girls car is faster than your skyline.

Now thats funnier.

Originally posted by INASNT

thats coz the cops and the rest of us know that u drive a shopping trolley, and dont say u will beat me, its not the point, even a cop thinks u drive a girls car!!! hahahahahaha :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/2/#findComment-163205
Share on other sites

Originally posted by poyz

At least this chick's car hasn't painted the interior baby blue...

Haha! You rice boy.

I'm off to do some shopping now, got many GTS-t's to spank around town :P

well atleast u wont have to worry about your car being stolen from the shopping center carpark, since u can use it to place all your shopping in since its a trolley!!

hahaha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/10068-power-chip/page/2/#findComment-163246
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...