Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, when i turn my ignition off, behind the passenger seat in rear panel trim (thats where it sounds like its coming from or the boot area) there is a loud "click" noise something like the sound of when u lock all your central locking, it all goes click at once, but its only when u turn off the ignition??? its got me stuffed, any one had this problem aswell, and what could it be???

thanx daz.

hey guys, when i turn my ignition off, behind the passenger seat in rear panel trim (thats where it sounds like its coming from or the boot area) there is a loud "click" noise something like the sound of when u lock all your central locking, it all goes click at once, but its only when u turn off the ignition??? its got me stuffed, any one had this problem aswell, and what could it be???

thanx daz.

Holy shiezen, Im going for fuel pump just switching off... that ones a dilly of a pickle :)

Hehhehe.. mine does that too! It's an electric tensioner on the seatbelts!

When the car is running, pull on the drivers belt... it resists a lot. Turn the car off... CLUNK! Now pull the belt... it's smooth with little resistance.

I pulled the rear quarters off when I removed my seat and ran wiring for my stereo, and the belt rolls have an electric something on it, with Australian branding. So I dare say it's an aftermarket thing that was fitted.

I have a pic at home if you're interested.

  • 1 month later...
Hehhehe.. mine does that too! It's an electric tensioner on the seatbelts!

When the car is running, pull on the drivers belt... it resists a lot. Turn the car off... CLUNK! Now pull the belt... it's smooth with little resistance.

I pulled the rear quarters off when I removed my seat and ran wiring for my stereo, and the belt rolls have an electric something on it, with Australian branding. So I dare say it's an aftermarket thing that was fitted.

I have a pic at home if you're interested.

yea post it up if you could, sorry i havent replied to this recently, i forgot all about it, just remembered today again. i though that it mite have sumthin to do with the seatbelts etc, but it was kinda wierd, bcoz it just started outta nowhere.... its pretty loud hey.

Edited by 85URK

Pretty loud, yeah!

I haven't had it for a while now, because my alarm's turbo timer keeps the ignition going after i've taken the belt off and gotten out of the car etc.

But yeah, have you tried pulling on it with the car running and not running? Could you feel the difference?

Pretty loud, yeah!

I haven't had it for a while now, because my alarm's turbo timer keeps the ignition going after i've taken the belt off and gotten out of the car etc.

But yeah, have you tried pulling on it with the car running and not running? Could you feel the difference?

yeah there is like a tensioner that only works when the car is going.

Umm.. no, I didn't. I found it when I made my new parcel-shelf. This is why a couple of shots are through the rear windscreen. =-]

The second pic shows the location. It's kinda under the parcel tray, but adjacent to the rear seat.

Oh, there's that little box that noone knows what it is for! Sits in the left bracket under the parcel tray in Series2's. The same bracket on the right-hand side is empty. Something to do with fuel, apparently.

But yeah, the seatbelt tensioner! Way cool, eh!? Looks to be an Aussie thing done, possibly during compliance. I don't think there is any way to "fix" the noise, cause it's a mechanical device. You could try unplugging it and having just regular spring-tensioned belts.

There is still a spring in them like normal belts, so this should work, and the teeth that grab the belt if it moves a certain speed should still work too. Best to test this though.

The third pic is of the front passenger belt. I had the rear passenger quarter-trim off to fix some broken clips and to run some RCA cables. It too looks to be wired for something, but it is not noisy, only the rears in my car.

Hope it helps! I love gadgets!

Umm.. no, I didn't. I found it when I made my new parcel-shelf. This is why a couple of shots are through the rear windscreen. =-]

The second pic shows the location. It's kinda under the parcel tray, but adjacent to the rear seat.

Oh, there's that little box that noone knows what it is for! Sits in the left bracket under the parcel tray in Series2's. The same bracket on the right-hand side is empty. Something to do with fuel, apparently.

But yeah, the seatbelt tensioner! Way cool, eh!? Looks to be an Aussie thing done, possibly during compliance. I don't think there is any way to "fix" the noise, cause it's a mechanical device. You could try unplugging it and having just regular spring-tensioned belts.

There is still a spring in them like normal belts, so this should work, and the teeth that grab the belt if it moves a certain speed should still work too. Best to test this though.

The third pic is of the front passenger belt. I had the rear passenger quarter-trim off to fix some broken clips and to run some RCA cables. It too looks to be wired for something, but it is not noisy, only the rears in my car.

Hope it helps! I love gadgets!

well i think il leave it, but if it gets worse or anything i mite pull it apart to look at. i just cant beleieve how noisey it is when u do it. u woulda thought that it was quite for a passenger car.... oh well. thanx for your diagnose anyway.

No worries... i've never seen it in anyone else's car, and noone seems to have ever heard of it before, but from what you describe, it's EXACTLY what mine does.

VERY lound clunk, and that seat-belt tension thing is wicked.

No worries... i've never seen it in anyone else's car, and noone seems to have ever heard of it before, but from what you describe, it's EXACTLY what mine does.

VERY lound clunk, and that seat-belt tension thing is wicked.

yeah my first though was it had sumthing to do with the seatbelt tensioner thingy, but its hard to explain what it is to sum1 who has never heard it. my mate were like "WTF" when they first heard it.lol i didnt know what to tell them, just said it sounds like the seat belt thingy to me. :D

  • 3 weeks later...

My 33 has these seatbelt tension thingys too... but they are connected to a wire under each front seat... looks like they used to be connected to the seatbelt socket thing. When the ignition is on, i can short the two pins on the blugs under the seat and there is the loud 'clunk' noise that you speak of. I've never really noticed too much of a difference between shorted and unshorted, but i'll have to try it out!

It sounds like yours are perminently shorted, so they always clunk when the ignition is turned off... try looking under the seats for a cord, and see if there is anything causing the two pins to be connected (the one on the passenger side is easiest, as it only has two pins, the drivers one has four.)

Okay, couldn't resist the temptation :rolleyes:

I went out and sat in in my car, turned the ignition on, and shorted/unshoreted the pins on the seatbelt connector... The belt seems to slide pretty much the same, although with the pins sgorted there is a slight ratchet-type noise when you pull it, whereas without the pins shorted it is quiet... I can't feel any more or less resistance either way though.

I think the "clunk" noise means that it's working, because mine will do it with ignition, and also if I press the seatbelt release button. Oh, and there is a definate change in resistance...

I think when the new compliance rules came out, the seatbelts had to be changed, whereas mine has the original jap belts according to the tag.

  • 4 years later...
Hehhehe.. mine does that too! It's an electric tensioner on the seatbelts!

When the car is running, pull on the drivers belt... it resists a lot. Turn the car off... CLUNK! Now pull the belt... it's smooth with little resistance.

I pulled the rear quarters off when I removed my seat and ran wiring for my stereo, and the belt rolls have an electric something on it, with Australian branding. So I dare say it's an aftermarket thing that was fitted.

I have a pic at home if you're interested.

i have this also. i would've sworn black and blue it was hicas locking itself or something like that... i'll have a listen for the seat belts next time i have someone else near by to turn off the ignition. i'll jump into the back seat and listen... very interesting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...