Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nah, that'll be classified as in the Skyline GTR section and your about 38seconds off the pace of Kamikaze, sorry

hey, he only beat my r31 gtsr time by 4 secs, give him some credit lol

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

You can also cheat majorly if you run the car straight over the grass just before the second last corner...and also if you full throttle and hug the wall around the Karoussel you get a faster launch out of the corner. None of my laps involve this, really!

Kamikaze I cannot stop watching that video in your sig, its preiceless >_<

  • 4 weeks later...

Wow, some really quick times in this thread!

Gave Nurburgring a crack the last couple of days - Heres my time with the only car i've really tested on the track:

-Modified R34 GT-R M-Spec Nur

-Racing Soft Tyres

-No Wings

-No NOS

-Really stiff suspension (72mm off the ground) and no traction control! = lots of fun :P

Time: 6:21.522

Steve.

Here it is, post your nurburgring lap times. I have also created sub categories for the fastest lap times

Heres a link to the old Nurb Laptimes Thread

Happy racing :D

Skyline GTR times

R31 GTSR - 7m06.509sec [KamikazeR33]

R32 GTR (N1) - 6m33.245secs [Topaz]

R33 GTR (Nismo LM) - 6m36.225sec [KamikazeR33]

R34 GTR (Carbon R) - 6m23.172sec [KamikazeR33]

R34 LM RACE CAR - 5m46.881sec [Topaz]

F1 car times

5m30.998secs [Topaz]

5m37.218secs [KamikazeR33]

Race car times

Nissan R92CP Race Car '92 - 5m09.446sec [v_twin]

Jaguar XJR9 Race Car '88- 5m29.043sec [Topaz]

Toyota TS020 - 5m36.533sec [KamikazeR33]

Peugeot 905 Race Car - 5m45.478sec [WHENNY19]

Audi R8 Race Car - 5m51.105sec [KamikazeR33]

Mitsubishi FTO Super Touring Car - 6m14.696sec [Topaz]

Auto Union V16 Type C Streamline - 6m57.772sec [Topaz]

Falken R34 GTR Race Car - 6m59.866sec [KamikazeR33]

Modified road car times

Unmodified car times

VW W12 Nardo Concept - 7m13.066sec [Topaz]

R34 GTR - 8m03.316sec [AzzurrA]

R33 GTR Vspec '97 - 8m37.421sec [Freddy Kruger]

R32 GTR Vspec '93 - 8m46.039sec [Freddy Kruger]

I have done a 05.07.989 with a Nissan R89C Racecar 89... hehe..

post-29787-1150186013.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...