Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Zdenko, put a set of Tomei's 256's in an R34 GTST and made 240 rwkw with a hi flowed R34 GTST turbo. That was 12 rwkw more maximum horsepower than the standard cams, but 20 rwkw more in the mid range. Result 0.4 sec 1/4 improvement.

This was the last mod we did, it already had HKS I/C, hi flow turbo, panel filter, alloy inlet tube, adj exhaust camshaft pulley, split dump pipe, hi flow cat, 3" exhaust and Power FC.

I would not recommend changing the cams until you have done the above. Better bang for your buck in these bits.

Hope that helps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11375-cams-for-rb25det/#findComment-193112
Share on other sites

I have done some research, GTS-t VSPEC (SAU) and SydneyKid (SDU) both given useful information, however cams setup will varies from turbo / setup..even same turbo on two different cars..

Also different degree (mine is 264...tomei makes 256, 264, 272) duration will shift the boost early or after...but fatter the power band is what I chasing for..

PM me for the price..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11375-cams-for-rb25det/#findComment-193121
Share on other sites

I agree with what your all saying, cams should be chosen with a turbo upgrade to maximise the power output, but midrange is just as important. If you go for really wild cams then you will loose power down low, so many are only good for drag racing. I think the 256's or 264's give you a nice usable street setup, and will certainly improve 1/4 mile times.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11375-cams-for-rb25det/#findComment-193126
Share on other sites

Guest Peewee

dear zdenko i believe the cams that are in the R33 are already too ****en big but un fortuanatly the complete **** up that nissan call the rb25 head is so grossely inefficiant that chasing decent midrange is pretty much out of the question so you may as well try and get it all up top than try to get a bit back in the middle where the cams will be efficient to 5000rpm and the head start being efficient at 4500rpm (for example) you may aswell do the best with what you got and aim for it up top!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11375-cams-for-rb25det/#findComment-195685
Share on other sites

Peewee, I would have to disagree with you on the RB25 head and cams, yes it is quite easy to make a balls-up of choosing cams, so that you only get top-end power, but I have seen many RB25's with very good mid-range.

The head is far from inefficient, and there are examples of many making big (500+) hp.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11375-cams-for-rb25det/#findComment-195700
Share on other sites

I'm with GTS-t VSPEC, the RB25 head is the same casting as the RB26 head. I have seen a mildly ported RB26 head make almost 1,000 bhp on the engine dyno and that's hardly an inefficient design. I have also seen an almost standard RB25 cylinder head on an RB30 bottom end do a 9.9 standing 1/4, that's hardly a inefficient design. I had a stock standard RB25 headed RB30 that made 550 ft lbs of torque at 5,200 rpm, that's hardly an inefficient design.

If you have previously had experiences with mismatched components, that is not really an indicator of inefficiencies or deficiencies in the design of the head. That's just poor selection criteria.

The end result is the sum of the parts, not the fault of one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11375-cams-for-rb25det/#findComment-195726
Share on other sites

I'd sugest either a set of 256's or 264's, both can be made to produce a smooth idle.

The 264's will provide more power, but don't go for too high a lift as you have hydraulic lifters.

Most of the manufacturers like HKS, Trust and Tomei produce excellent camshafts.

See'ya:burnout:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11375-cams-for-rb25det/#findComment-195760
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • To expand on this to help understanding... The bigger/longer the block is, the more it's going to work to sit on your far away high areas, and not touch the low stuff in the middle. When you throw the guide coat, and give it a quick go with a big block, guide coat will disappear in the high spots. If those high spots are in the correct position where the panel should be, stop sanding, and fill the low spots. However, using a small block, you "fall off" one of the high spots, and now your sanding the "side of the hill". Your little block would have been great for the stone chips, where you only use a very small amount of filler, so you're sanding and area let's say the size of a 5/10cent piece, with something that is 75*150. For the big panel, go bigger!   And now I'll go back to my "body work sucks, it takes too much patience, and I don't have it" PS, I thought your picture with coloured circles was an ultra sound... That's after my brain thought you were trying to make a dick and balls drawing...
    • Oh I probably didn't speak enough about the small sanding block for blocking large areas.  In the video about 3 minutes in, he talks about creating valleys in the panel. This is the issue with using a small sanding block for a large area, it's way too easy to create the valleys he is talking about. With a large block its much easier to create a nice flat surface.  Hard to explain but in practice you'll notice the difference straight away using the large block. 
    • Yep I guessed as much. You'll find life much easier with a large block something like this -  https://wholesalepaint.com.au/products/dura-block-long-hook-loop-sanding-block-100-eva-rubber-af4437 This is a good demo video of something like this in use -    You have turned your small rock chip holes into large low spots. You'll need to fill and block these low spots.  It's always a little hard not seeing it in person, but yes I would go ahead and lay filler over the whole area. Have a good look at the video I linked, it's a very good example of all the things you're doing. They went to bare metal, they are using guide coat, they are doing a skim coat with the filler and blocking it back. If what you're doing doesn't look like what they are doing, that's a big hint for you  
    • The odometer does go up when driving.  Does this tell it is an issue with the speedometer itself?    Where can I look for replacement cluster? Or speedo? I can likely do the repair.. Will ER34 cluster work on HR34? Or do I need a HR34 20GT S2 specifically lol   
    • Mine's a bit bigger at 70x150mm roughly. The spots are flat, just can feel the edges if I dig my nail into it. I did fix some other other ones by both using my finger to sand that small spot (I'm a bit wary of doing this and creating hot spots and a bigger mess) and I also did sand over it flat and others, but this also worried me a bit because if I create an overall low spot on the panel on paint that is good.  Correct me if I'm wrong but as long as it's flat even if I can feel the edges, I can put filler because it will all be level once I sand it? I can see myself going in a circle after sanding guidecoat with 320 grit if for example the panel is flat with my hand but because I sanded the guidecoat I could have created a low spot again somewhere. Unless where I'm going wrong is what I mentioned previously where I didn't go low enough on the grits. It's 1 step forward and 2 step backwards here haha. I'll probably need to experiment with it more. Last time I go back to bare metal lol.
×
×
  • Create New...