Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I reckon you'll need full engine management to get up to the 190-200rwkw mark (non shootout mode that is). To get that kind of power without major mods to the engine, you'll need to push the turbo hard. I've only got 177rwkw with most of the mods below, but I'm just using a SAFC and a bleeder.

So you'd probably need something like the following:

Big FMIC

14psi using an EBC

Full exhaust

Power FC (or other full computer)

CAI with a pod filter, or a really good panel filter which may not be possible with a FMIC)

possibly an adjustable ex cam gear - although I feel it hurt my bottom end too much.

Feel free to correct me anyone :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11698-the-plan-190rwkw/#findComment-204735
Share on other sites

Also make sure you go to a good tuner. If you can't quite meet your kilowatt target, don't push it too hard. You'll be hard pressed to notice the difference between 195rwkw and 200rwkw. I'd take a safe 195rwkw engine over a 200rwkw hand grenade engine with really lean AF ratios.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11698-the-plan-190rwkw/#findComment-204740
Share on other sites

Hi.....

With the following mods.

- APEXI S-AFC

- Electronic Boost Controller (set to .8 bar)

- HKS CAT Back Exhaust

- Pod Filter

My car recently dynoed 188rwKw (this was in shootout mode though).............

The S-AFC I purchased for $400 from someone on this forum and the boost controller I got for $200 on EBAY.

My next upgrade will be the rest of the exhaust.....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11698-the-plan-190rwkw/#findComment-204892
Share on other sites

Before I had the boost controller installed I had the car dynoed and in non shootout mode acheived 147rwKW running standard boost....though it should be noted that the day was stinking hot - 40 degrees which didn't help....

I've only had the boost controller for a few weeks but normally just drive around with the boost set to standard.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11698-the-plan-190rwkw/#findComment-205633
Share on other sites

Im not sure of the difference between standard and shootout mode but im guessing their is a small difference.

Anyhow in shootout mode:

191rwkw

12psi

FMIC

HKS Pod Filter

Cat-back 3" Exhaust

Std Turbo

Std ECU

98 Octane Optimax

203rwkw (36c heat)- (186rwkw @ 7psi)

12psi

FMIC

HKS Pod Filter

3" Full Exhaust

Std Turbo

Std ECU

98 OCtane Optimax

New oil

http://skylines.pnc.com.au.dyno-203rwkw.jpg

Not bad but im confident i can get it up to 210rwkw with the Std Turbo + ECU.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11698-the-plan-190rwkw/#findComment-205756
Share on other sites

With the recent SAU dyno day in melbourne there were a few R33 at around 180rwkw and above and that was a pretty hot and humid day.

Mine pushed 183 (and wasn't running too great), inasnt: 185, and I think it was west (who's car is currently for sale btw) pushed 190 at the rear wheels - all with standard turbos.

Its quite achieveable, and bolt on a bigger turbo and you be able to get upwards of 230rwkw without touching the insides.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11698-the-plan-190rwkw/#findComment-205788
Share on other sites

Shootout mode is meant to be used to compare figures between cars. It locks the roller ramp rate, and it can't be modified at all, so you can be sure that any car measured with it can have its power accurately compared with any other one tested with it.

Now, from what I've heard, it adds around 10% to what you would normally get on a properly set up dyno, so 203kw really is around 184kw (A damn good result considering you've got a stock ECU, benm). That said, you can't really just take off the 10% extra to compare with people run in non-shootout mode, as this opens you up to differences in how the non-shootout mode dyno was set up.

So, if you want to compare figures use shootout mode, but be aware that the figures are inflated.

Cheers,

Michael

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11698-the-plan-190rwkw/#findComment-205840
Share on other sites

The car came with a Micks Metalcrafts 'bar n plate' FMIC which i have been told has quite a thick core (Not sure on the exact measurements I had them here somewhere but lost the info).

Didn't touch the AFM

2 Stage boost controller, can't remember the brand.

Not sure when 12psi comes on but 1 of the 'Unigroup' guys on the forums here said in 4th gear on the dyno I was making 6psi @ 2,200rpm. I have no idea if thats good or bad.

Ben.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/11698-the-plan-190rwkw/#findComment-206413
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
    • Probably not. A workshop grade scantool is my go to for proper Consult interrogation. Any workshop grade tool should do it. Just go to a workshop.
    • In my head it does make sense to be a fuel problem since that is what I touched when cleaning the system. When I was testing with the fuel pressure gauge, the pressure was constantly 2.5 bar with the FPR vacuum removed. When stalling, the pressure was going up to 3.0 bar (which is how it should be on ignition).
    • ECUtalk pages don't mention they support the ABS computer (consult port has more than one CAN), so you might just need a different scan tool. But, I would expect ABS is a different light to the brake warning/handbrake light, do you see an ABS light come on for a few seconds when you turn the key from ACC to IGN? But since you said: I'd have a look at the ABS sensors in the rear hubs to make sure they are not damaged, disconnected etc.
×
×
  • Create New...