Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A few months ago i got my car tuned to 11 psi and got 205rwkw with an af/r of ~11. Now on a little more boost the car doesnt go at all like it has fuel cut out and the engine just jerks when it cuts out. I had my timing advanced and i have been told the standard ecu resets itsself when it exceeds 205rwkw. I am assuming my timing has gone back to zero. Under load on high boost it misses alot. Hits full boost approx 13 - 14psi at 3 - 4,000 rpm and after that it feels like nothing. just slow revving to 7,000 rpm.

If anyone can shed some light on this, it will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Phill [LTHLRB]

Edited by LTHLRB
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127452-tuning-out-of-wack/
Share on other sites

do you have a remap?

if YES

the ecu could be picking up excessive detonation and dropping to the low octane map

was the rich and retard protection removed/disabled/edit'ed to go away?

if NO

rich and retard is being activated due to the ecu seeing excessive airflow, ie: more than it is happy with dealing with, so it panics and protects itself, dumps the timing and richens itself up. a search will give you the answers you are looking for

it wasnt remapped. It was going fine for a while and i ran a 13.1 second pass at calder in full street trim. But after that it just died out. I think its retarding and getting very rich. Fuel economy is out the window. Engine isnt pinging or knocking though. Fuel delivery is fine. 500hp tomei pump is doing well. The car is going in tomorow to get tuned. Is there any way to remap the standard ecu's ?

well the dyno tuner is going to run through the afr's. Also re gap the plugs. Also get the right boost and check for pinging/knocking. Also advance timing to a safe but good level. Not much really you can do to a standard ecu. I just want it to last till nov/dec when i get my power fc :O

  • 4 weeks later...

like paulr33 said, too much boost made it dump the timing and richen itself up. The plugs were re gapped and pinging and knocking was checked. Ignition timing was advanced to a safe level. Made more power than last time on 11psi. Cant go much more than that or it will do the same thing over again.

like paulr33 said, too much boost made it dump the timing and richen itself up. The plugs were re gapped and pinging and knocking was checked. Ignition timing was advanced to a safe level. Made more power than last time on 11psi. Cant go much more than that or it will do the same thing over again.

out of interest how far did they advance the timing? i know stock is 15degrees advanced at 650rpm? is 20degrees advanced at 650rpm doable?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...