Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A few months ago i got my car tuned to 11 psi and got 205rwkw with an af/r of ~11. Now on a little more boost the car doesnt go at all like it has fuel cut out and the engine just jerks when it cuts out. I had my timing advanced and i have been told the standard ecu resets itsself when it exceeds 205rwkw. I am assuming my timing has gone back to zero. Under load on high boost it misses alot. Hits full boost approx 13 - 14psi at 3 - 4,000 rpm and after that it feels like nothing. just slow revving to 7,000 rpm.

If anyone can shed some light on this, it will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Phill [LTHLRB]

Edited by LTHLRB
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/127452-tuning-out-of-wack/
Share on other sites

do you have a remap?

if YES

the ecu could be picking up excessive detonation and dropping to the low octane map

was the rich and retard protection removed/disabled/edit'ed to go away?

if NO

rich and retard is being activated due to the ecu seeing excessive airflow, ie: more than it is happy with dealing with, so it panics and protects itself, dumps the timing and richens itself up. a search will give you the answers you are looking for

it wasnt remapped. It was going fine for a while and i ran a 13.1 second pass at calder in full street trim. But after that it just died out. I think its retarding and getting very rich. Fuel economy is out the window. Engine isnt pinging or knocking though. Fuel delivery is fine. 500hp tomei pump is doing well. The car is going in tomorow to get tuned. Is there any way to remap the standard ecu's ?

well the dyno tuner is going to run through the afr's. Also re gap the plugs. Also get the right boost and check for pinging/knocking. Also advance timing to a safe but good level. Not much really you can do to a standard ecu. I just want it to last till nov/dec when i get my power fc :O

  • 4 weeks later...

like paulr33 said, too much boost made it dump the timing and richen itself up. The plugs were re gapped and pinging and knocking was checked. Ignition timing was advanced to a safe level. Made more power than last time on 11psi. Cant go much more than that or it will do the same thing over again.

like paulr33 said, too much boost made it dump the timing and richen itself up. The plugs were re gapped and pinging and knocking was checked. Ignition timing was advanced to a safe level. Made more power than last time on 11psi. Cant go much more than that or it will do the same thing over again.

out of interest how far did they advance the timing? i know stock is 15degrees advanced at 650rpm? is 20degrees advanced at 650rpm doable?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, sort of blurring two different things together, aren't we? I just meant O2 feedback closed loop. I used to have a 0-1V LCD meter on my dash, wired directly to the O2 sensor signal. So you could easily see what it was doing. Normal running it would flick back and forth nicely. Slow down to an idle and it would keep flicking, as the ECU tried to servo to maintain stoich, but it would slow down as each swing happened until it would stay at one end of the scale. As I said above, the sensor heater is not enough to keep it hot enough when there is also little heat in the exhaust flow. Give it a blip and it would start swinging again, then peter out again. Meanwhile, idle speed control would run just fine, because unrelated.
    • It's not even O2 feedback, it's just simply when the ECU sees the closed TPS signal for whatever reason the idle will start steadily dropping until the engine dies. With the TPS adjusted to not trigger closed TPS it will idle at some ridiculously high RPM and something like 6 degrees of timing. In the absence of getting eyes on it personally and a lot of quality time doing diagnostics I couldn't tell you what the real problem was but it was interesting nonetheless
    • Oof. One of my mates has an R34 GT-R that he initially was a "I want to go twins for response and convenience" on his stock 2.6 with Kelford 272 cams, but his friends are pests and were always in his ear about their place being in the bin.   Eventually one of the 2860-5s decided to add it's own input and force his hand, so he conceded and went for a Pulsar 6262G ("G35 900") with T4 0.85 hotside.    Here's an overlay of the results, same cams, same stock bottom end, same boost, same fuel, just from a pretty tidy 2860-5 install to a Pulsar turbo on a 6boost maniifold on BP98.   Worth mentioning here, it may seem like a dead horse thing but the dyno plot doesn't tell the story of how much better it is to drive - transient response has completely changed the car, he used to have flat foot shifting to stop it having to wind up again on gear changes even at >7000rpm... now it builds boost faster than that even short shifting.   It's 100% transformed the car before you even consider how much better it holds on: Pulsar and Garrett aren't the same, but from our experience if you're just looking for a better drive and the ability to make the same or more power I think the divided G30 770 would probably be the smallest I'd go to.
    • Great work Duncan, any events local you will give it a test once all done? 
×
×
  • Create New...