Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

I have a set of 4 wheels, NISMO LMGT4's in Bronze colour for sale.

They are off my S14 as I now have 17's on there for street use.

SIze is 18 x 9.5 for hte rear and 18 x 8.5 for the front.

not sure about hte offset, they were off an R33 skyline originally I was told. and fit my S14 perfectly. so would probably suit most skylines.

One front left rim has some minor rash on it. (damn driveway) other then that the rest are in good condition.

asking price is $2400. willing to neg if you are serious. but serious offers please. I was told these in this size would be around 1100 per wheel new or something like that (NISMO, what do you expect)

Now these wheels are awesome, they arelighter then std 16" R32 GTR wheels. you can lift them easily with one hand including tyre on it. HOWEVER you will need new tyres on them as they are shagged at the moment. why I have the price really low.

please contact me via mobile as I rarely have time with work to be on forums these days :)

0411113875

pics available via email if you sms me or call. or I can arrange inspection

cheers

mark

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/129940-fs-nismo-lmgt4s/
Share on other sites

Just spent over $1100 on new tyres for my 17's!!! If not i would have bought these too!!! well if ur interested in trade for Black centre/chrome dish 2 piece Kakimoto NG-T in 17 x 8 and 17 x9 (same as the ones Allblitz is selling on this forum) with new Falken FK-452 + cash adjustment please let me know:)

Cheers

Jason

Edited by JaseR33
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/129940-fs-nismo-lmgt4s/#findComment-2404264
Share on other sites

if you read the first post, as per that, TYRES ARE SHAGGED! big time

2 fronts are camber worn to death (not my car, like that when I got them)

2 rears are the same but have screws in the tyres aswell. not worth repairing.

but come on for this price guys, the rims are 1100 EACH I am told without tyres brand new. this is like less then half the price!!

mark

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/129940-fs-nismo-lmgt4s/#findComment-2437999
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...