Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No bigger than 2.25 or 2.5

Not many off the shelf skyline exhausts which are 2.25 or 2.5 unless you want a used gts-t stock exhaust.

Go source out a custom exhaust from an exhaust shop and get some quotes.

yeah will do asoon as i get same cash together.... i want a performance exhaust so probably round 2" would be best huh...

Edited by Caza
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156951-best-exhaust/#findComment-2918005
Share on other sites

yeah will do asoon as i get same cash together.... i want a performance exhaust so probably round 2" would be best huh...

Is this for an RB20de or RB25de

2.25" mandrel would prob be best, with heatwrapped extractors - if your after performance

Even with an RB20de i would think with a few mods (cam/intake) you would lose top end with a 2", by heatwrapping your extractors and maybe some of your exhaust (with no/highflow cat and mufflers) should keep your exhaust nice and hot (hot air takes up more space but is lighter = flows faster) with a healthy back pressure.

Edited by SKiT_R31
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156951-best-exhaust/#findComment-2918201
Share on other sites

Is this for an RB20de or RB25de

2.25" mandrel would prob be best, with heatwrapped extractors - if your after performance

Even with an RB20de i would think with a few mods (cam/intake) you would lose top end with a 2", by heatwrapping your extractors and maybe some of your exhaust (with no/highflow cat and mufflers) should keep your exhaust nice and hot (hot air takes up more space but is lighter = flows faster) with a healthy back pressure.

Yea what he said, 2.25 and/or 2.5 is the optimum size for a gts.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156951-best-exhaust/#findComment-2918270
Share on other sites

Is this for an RB20de or RB25de

2.25" mandrel would prob be best, with heatwrapped extractors - if your after performance

Even with an RB20de i would think with a few mods (cam/intake) you would lose top end with a 2", by heatwrapping your extractors and maybe some of your exhaust (with no/highflow cat and mufflers) should keep your exhaust nice and hot (hot air takes up more space but is lighter = flows faster) with a healthy back pressure.

this is for an rb20de,yeah i suppose i have to see what the guy at the shop says about it, he did my sisters exhaust and asked what sound your after aswell as tip size and perfomance and all that.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156951-best-exhaust/#findComment-2920078
Share on other sites

Hey mate, I have an r33 with a RB25DE, I have a 2.5inch straight thru exhaust from the cat back with a cannon on it, The tip is 4" but the muffler itself is just 2.5. I also got them to put a resonator on, Its damn loud and still has the RB purr to it. Hopefully soon i can sus out some extractors and a high flow cat to complete the system, Sorry to thread hijack but could someone please help out with that.

Need extractors and a high flow cat for an RB25DE fitted.

thnks

josh.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156951-best-exhaust/#findComment-2924055
Share on other sites

Hey mate, I have an r33 with a RB25DE, I have a 2.5inch straight thru exhaust from the cat back with a cannon on it, The tip is 4" but the muffler itself is just 2.5. I also got them to put a resonator on, Its damn loud and still has the RB purr to it. Hopefully soon i can sus out some extractors and a high flow cat to complete the system, Sorry to thread hijack but could someone please help out with that.

Need extractors and a high flow cat for an RB25DE fitted.

thnks

josh.

hey man can u send me a vid or sound file of it purring away

thanks

plus i wuldnt know about getting extractors or high flo cat

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156951-best-exhaust/#findComment-2924151
Share on other sites

http://s72.photobucket.com/albums/i165/obn...nt=MOV00757.flv

There ya go, Sorry about the large filesize i recently re installed XP and dont have any vid editing tools.

sounds good man wait till you get a high flow cat and extractors, it'll be awesome

Edited by Caza
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/156951-best-exhaust/#findComment-2926393
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...