Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all here is a little scenario for you that i am currently in, last year my r34 gt put out 118 kW after putting on a stainless steel catback exhaust (it was doing 101 kW fully stock), at the time i was using bp ultimate in the car, not long after that i changed the fuel and started to use shell/coles v-power, both are premium unleaded, yesterday i got splitfire coilpack installed, before getting them put in though we did a power run to see what the car was putting out so i could then work how much kW she gained from them, low and behold the car was only doing 111 kW. i couldnt understand why it dropped 7kW in under 5 mths. anyways it has gained back that 7 kW through the spiltfire coilpacks. (when if the car was still running at 118 kW it should be sitting at 125 kW at the moment).

in the long run we came to the conclusion that because i had changed fuel companies from ultimate to v power this has had an effect on the power coming out of the car.

so has anyone else noticed a change in there power from changing fuel companies?

the thing to do now is: run down the tank of v-power currently in the car, fill up the bp ultimate end of next week, keep using ultimate for a few weeks then take the car back down to the dyno and see what happens!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162587-changing-fuel-companies/
Share on other sites

Alot of people say all this talk about different fuels producing different power is a bit of a myth.. I'm not entirely sure, but there is a big write up in HPI about the use of different fuels. Here's the main part of it..

The synopsis

Get a selection of high-octane pump fuels and tune the car to see which makes the best power.

Instead of simply adding a product and 'pulling' the Skyline (rb26) to see what power it makes this time we had to monitor the engine's knock level via the A'PEXi Power FC programmable management system, then optimise the tune to give the biggest result.

And the results are as follows..

BP ultimate: 223.5kW

Mobil Synergy: 220.3kW

Pump 95 Octane: 211.5kW

United Boost 98: 232.2kw ( 10% ethanol, but adds 3.5% oxygen as well as the promise of excellent knock resistance into the equation)

(sorry no v-power was tested :) )

The conclusion

If you want to spend the time and effort having your engine tuned to run on an ethanol-based fuel, then our testing shows that you will definately get a solid peformance result and benefit. However, bear in mind that with tuning and dyno time this whole process could cost you upwards of $500, which for some may be a small price to pay, and for others totally out of the ball park. You're also stuck with the situation of only being able to fill up at one chain of service stations, which is a serious limitation in the practicality of your car.

In this instance, the current 98-octane non-ethanol unleaded fuels still do an excellent joband make decent power. As our testing has shown, there doesn't seem to be a great deal of difference in having any particular brand loyalty, as both conventional 98 octane fuels performed in an extremely similar fashion. As for the 95 octane? The results speak for themselves.

(HPI Magazine)

So yea there are differences in which fuel you're using. Although they wouldn't be felt as much without a tune for a specific kind.

From my own experience.. Vortex makes my car fart like hell. Since then I've been switching between BP and v-Power. I've only used boost united once.. Although recently one opened up near me so I might start giving that a run a little more.

i think there are a few other factors (along with different fuels) you'll need to take into consideration cara.

- was it on the same dyno?

- were the dyno settings the same?

- were the intake and ambient temperatures the same/similar on both days?

i've had my car on the same dyno on the same day run back to back and can confidently say you will most likely always get a ~5kw variance each run.

yes fuel mixtures have some effect, and yes it's advised that if your car is tuned for a specific brand of fuel it's best to run that particular brand as much as possible. it is also not uncommon to have a bad batch of fuel, maybe the petrol station tanks were running low (sediments on the bottom? or whatever).

7kw is nothing to worry about, i bet the next time you run it'll be different again.

I'm a little sceptical of the 95ron result.

I've played around with different fuels (ulp, pulp, 98 and 98 eth). Mobil & BP 98 are on par, 98 eth there is a small increase in power but as for ulp and pulp. They both require much reduced ignition due to high knock levels.

I'm a little sceptical of the 95ron result.

I've played around with different fuels (ulp, pulp, 98 and 98 eth). Mobil & BP 98 are on par, 98 eth there is a small increase in power but as for ulp and pulp. They both require much reduced ignition due to high knock levels.

I too noticed that mobil and BP are about the same

its just gonna be one of thinks that i wont know until i get the fuel into the car and give it a couple of weeks and hopefully the car will get that 7 kW back. i wanna be able to show people that n/a cars can still get a decent amount a kW, in the sense of being n/a of course.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...