Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It depends on how you feel about it.

The story goes that if you ask for a custom plenum they generally fabricate the top end, bolt it onto the original plenum bottom and them feed the pipe next to your water bottle. They give you back all the bits left over.

But at this point the Greddy looks like the goods to me.

T.

Originally posted by judd

yeh shipping + duties Ed? still under $1000? oh and forget about installation?

you can quote all the prices you want. you just give people false assumptions, let me see you do it less than a grand!

gimme $990 and i'll bring one over :rolleyes:

Hi IGTS-t VSPEC you posted "I have the Greddy one and have found a substantial gain in the mid-range just by adding it, plus at high rpm it doesn't fall off power as quick."

I get that comment a lot from people, so I like to dig a little. Did you do anything else at the same time as putting it on? Tuning? Intercooler? Pipework? Heat shielding? Boost? New spark plugs? Oil change? etc

Moving on to, "Can't say what the distribution to each cylinder is like though."

That's always a tough one, the single lambda sensor only tells you the average A/F across all 6, not if one is lean and another is rich. We use a high temp laser pyrometer on each of the exhaust manifold primary runners. If the distribution is good then the temp of each pipe is the same. A lambda sensor in each pipe would be better, but unless the manifold has the fittings that's a bit difficult.

Even using the temperature measure we get some arguably poor results, 40 degree differences are not uncommon, compared to a standard manifold of less than 10 degrees.

When we do this we juggle the injectors around ie; stick the ones with slightly more flow into the "hot" cylinders as they are the leanest running. Two "wrongs" sometime do make a "right", except those cylinder will make more power and thus have more cylinder pressure. This leads to unbalanced crankshaft loading and increases the chance of harmonic related failure. Better than detonation on 1 or 2 cylinders though.

Hope that adds to the discussion

Sydneykid,

I had to change the pipework at the same time, but my power doesn't drop off till much later than people with simliar designed pipework and stock plenum.

I can see what your getting at, and it's always difficult to tell what is the true impact of a modification.

I was lead to believe that even the standard plenum design led to overheating of the no.6 cylinder, hence why most piston problems occur there.

Originally posted by ed

actually no, sorry. I will bring it over for $990 for someone else and I will show you the receipts all the way through the process.

:P

cool want 40c?

not to be rude, but im sure i can do better than $990.00 point is that after install, not to meantion duties + tax if it gets caught up. Just like an intercooler I got for Z32 it got caught in customs as they didnt believe the reciept. Worth the risk? Altho its a Pleneum is it worth the risk? who are you really doing a favour?

Hi GTS-t VSPEC, the No 6 problems we have seen have been GTR's, never seen any evidence of unevenness with a standard RB20/25 inlet manifold. Plus on the GTR's it only seems to be at high boost levels (over 1.3 bar) up to that level and it seems perfectly OK.

The bolt pattern on the inlet manifold to head is different between the RB26 and RB20/25, so it won't bolt straight up. Lots of fabrication/welding required. I was very interested to read the comparison on an RB20, in the latest Zoom, between the RB26 and RB20 inlet manifolds. The car produced more power everywhere using the RB20 manifold.

I have seen similar results with SR20's and some big brand name inlet manifolds and plenums. If they can't get it right on a 4 cylinder, what hope is there on 6?

This is a good thread, worthy of some time.

Originally posted by judd

cool want 40c?  

not to be rude, but im sure i can do better than $990.00 point is that after install, not to meantion duties + tax if it gets caught up. Just like an intercooler I got for Z32 it got caught in customs as they didnt believe the reciept. Worth the risk? Altho its a Pleneum is it worth the risk? who are you really doing a favour?

Not to be rude? :bahaha:

You got a PM.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
    • Short inlet runners cost quite a bit. Dulls off the off-boost torque, and delays boost onset, because arrival of boost is driven by gas flow is a product of the ability to flow air which is torque. This is the reason that the stock manifolds have longer runners. On a 3L, or bigger, you can usually accept the compromise of giving away some torque because the extra capacity gives you a little extra to waste. But on a smaller motor, there's not a lot there to start with. Example, I swapped RB20 out of my R32, 25NeoDET in its place. The "wall of torque" that I experienced afterwards made it all worthwhile. That's because I came from RB20 land where torque is not a thing. But I would not do anything, anything at all, to reduce the low/mid torque I have now, because I remember what it is like to not have it!
×
×
  • Create New...