Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest INASNT
Originally posted by dabigbolf

inasnt whered u get yours how much?  and is having it venting to atmosphere better or worse.  as i see yours dont have the filter on top.  still looks neat though.

i actually bought it off some1 on here!

if u want to vent it to atmosphere then all u gotta do is drill a hole in the top and insert a filter on top.

hehe,

i'd think not.

from what i have gathered it just makes the air go out easier.

some just have a little hole, but the venting one, vents more.

i think heard someone say they lost a litre of oil due to one, on track day on the vl turbo forums.

but that would have been fullstick non stop for 5 or 10 minutes of laps.

The difference between a catch can, and an oil/air seperator is that a catch can simply collects the crankcase fumes, grabs the oil out of it, and lets the air go. It would theoretically fill up with oil eventually and need to be emptied. An oil/air seperator is the same thing, except that it has an oil drain back into the sump, thus reducing the maintainance level, and ensuring that you don't run low on oil in situation where the crankcase may be breathing heavily ie. track use.

For both devices, the vented air can be routed back into the intake (where it originally went anyway) as it should now be free of oil, and this will eliminate any possible legal issues with emissions etc. At minimum a filter should be fitted because a) the catch can/seperator won't be 100% efficient, so there will still be *some* oil vapour in the air, and B) the crankcase can breathe both ways, and you don't want to be drawing unfiltered air into the crankcase.

Hope that clears it up a bit.

Belly_up - thanks for distinguishing the difference between a catch can and an oil/air seperator. I've been looking into buying one & I didnt think that there was a difference - now I know. I guess the oil/air separator would be more 'acceptable' to EPA as it is plumbed back?

Either of them can have the *air* outlet plumbed back, and thats what the EPA would be worried about.

The advantage of the oil / air seperator is that you keep your oil in the sump rather than collecting it in the catch can. As i said above, it's really only going to be a issue for prolonged high RPM use, not so much on the street.

And when shopping, the two names are used interchangeably by most people (and rightly so, because a "catch can" is acting as an oil/air seperator), so check for whether the particular item has an oil drain fitting, to determine whether it is what you want or not.

This is from the Autospeed article "Pots and Cans... Step-by-step fabrication of swirl pots and catch cans/oil-air separators..."

ASE offers two different products to prevent blow-by oil entering your engine's air intake - a catch can and an oil-air separator. What's the difference, you ask? Well, a catch can receives blow-by oil and allows fumes to vent to atmosphere after being filtered. On the other hand, an oil-air separator internally filters the blow-by oil and allows only clean air to enter the car's induction system. This is the favoured approach from an emissions and legality perspective, but it doesn't look as siik when you pop the bonnet
  • 2 weeks later...
Originally posted by DennisRB30

If you get rid of the PCV system your engine will build up harmfull acidic gases which contaminate the oil reducing engine life.

I just got rid of my PCV and vented it straight to the Atmosphere. Is this bad? or is it only bad when you block it of completely. I'm finding alot of oil and shite in the intake. Never really known about the PCV, lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...