Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

quick question lads

recently purchased r34 rear end

ie - cradle, driveshafts, control arms, uprights and diffs

is the r33 and r34 rear end the same?

also this diff is 4.11, which says to me it's gtr diff correct?

anyway basically just need to clarify that r34/r33 is an identical rear end.

thread can be deleted once i get the answer i'm after

cheers, mark

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/170970-rear-end-question/
Share on other sites

you love the rear end don't you mark?

and just to give you some help.

GTT and GTR rear ends are different. one easy to spot one is the way the rear shocks fit to the hubs. if your new hubs accept a fork style shock then they are GTR. if the rear diff is a 34 GTR one it won't be 4.11 i don't think. I'm pretty sure the 34 GTR diff is different to 32 and 33 as the 34 uses the getrag 6 speed (could be wrong).

Manual R34 GTT diff is 4.111

I have had R34 GTT and R32 GTR diff housings in my car.

I have got R32 GTR hubs and drive shafts in my GTT. This leads me to believe that R32 to R34 is basically the same.

I know that's not a perfect answer but it's all I got.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...