Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

best contacting 6boost he will be able to do one for you but its going to cost about 1200 id say if you cant find him here contact him on the nissan silvia forums

Cheers

A

circuit, been sweet so far no issues, but there was some talk about them having issues, but they are fixed now as far as I am aware.

cheers

PAR Dog Box with billet input shaft and crown wheel and Pinion + Nismo LSD.

Having said that all has been well with the gearset and I am ware of a few other cars using the same box with know issues.

Same as THEO and MARK, you start putting a 1000hp through a PPG dogbox and you will get issues, as they have found.

yeh your not wrong there. Nothing is bulletproof unfortunately, but most of the time its decided by how much horsepower is put through it.

How long have you had the box in the car for?

to be completely honest its for a SSS pulsar with a GTiR motor and PAR Straight Cut Dog box heheehh.

*applause* mate thats sweet.. have u got the AWD..? hope so..

PAR dog box hey. Have heard alot of people having dramas with those. What is the car for?

mate the Par box is good for the GTiR.. very common as GTiR shit boxes as common as CA spit CAS'

circuit, been sweet so far no issues, but there was some talk about them having issues, but they are fixed now as far as I am aware.

cheers

PAR Dog Box with billet input shaft and crown wheel and Pinion + Nismo LSD.

Having said that all has been well with the gearset and I am ware of a few other cars using the same box with know issues.

Same as THEO and MARK, you start putting a 1000hp through a PPG dogbox and you will get issues, as they have found.

you'll be fine mate.. i was gonna use either one on my old GTiR.. but decided to sell and GTR is far more fun :bunny:

your doing the right thing

damn straight about kyles work. You wouldnt go through the copycat getting around. The amount of extra service kyle provides besides just the manifold is just insane. He is a very switched on bloke. And if he were gay....i would marry him ;)

damn straight about kyles work. You wouldnt go through the copycat getting around. The amount of extra service kyle provides besides just the manifold is just insane. He is a very switched on bloke. And if he were gay....i would marry him ;)

soo ur gay then? seeing as u said if HE was gay ud marry him...:D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
×
×
  • Create New...