Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I got my disks machined yesterday due to some vibration caused by some grooves worn into one disk.

Apart from the grooves on one of the disks they were in perfect condition without any shudder etc, and only a few months old.

They machined 0.75mm off one disk, and 0.77mm off the other disk. Since they have 2mm of life this means they have machined off approx 40% of the usable disk.

When you get your disks machined for whatever reason, what is the average amount of material machined off? Is this normal or am i justified in being really pissed off?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/176881-brake-disk-machining/
Share on other sites

the will machine off whatever is the minimum in order to get a nice true surface. if your grooves were say .35mm thick (which is bugger all) then they would need to machine off double that.

the will machine off whatever is the minimum in order to get a nice true surface. if your grooves were say .35mm thick (which is bugger all) then they would need to machine off double that.

Yes of course they do, that is not what i want to know.

To be more specific, assuming there was no visible grooves, just the usual shudder that develops, how much is generally shaved off? And say you have to shave off 0.2mm off one side but only 0.1mm off the other side, would you just shave 0.2mm off each side to make the rotors even thickness, or shave off the minimum off each side and leave the rotors slightly different thicknesses?

Grooves don't cause a shudder by themselves.

It's most likely they had a bit of run out due to warping.

I had a pair of discs machined the other day that looked perfect but caused a shudder.

I lost 1mm thickness to clean up the run out but now the brakes pedal is smooth again.

Yes of course they do, that is not what i want to know.

To be more specific, assuming there was no visible grooves, just the usual shudder that develops, how much is generally shaved off? And say you have to shave off 0.2mm off one side but only 0.1mm off the other side, would you just shave 0.2mm off each side to make the rotors even thickness, or shave off the minimum off each side and leave the rotors slightly different thicknesses?

Hang on your first post said that you had grooves in your disks causing vibration hence why they were machined in the first place but that would generally be caused by warping as well...

If thats the case then they will generally machine each disk to the same drop so that you not only get even wear but also lifetime out of the set and not having to replace 1 or 2 at different times.

Did you talk to your mechanic before/after you picked them up and question why they were machined to the levels they were and also what tolerance would be left???

You can be lucky sometimes and have them machined exceeding the minimum thickness but its not really recommended and most places would probably refuse to do so.

If your brakes are set up correctly then you shouldn't have to worry about the rotor for a while so chances are your not even going to own the car by the time they have to be machined again due to wear and tear anyhow :domokun:

Hang on your first post said that you had grooves in your disks causing vibration hence why they were machined in the first place but that would generally be caused by warping as well...

If thats the case then they will generally machine each disk to the same drop so that you not only get even wear but also lifetime out of the set and not having to replace 1 or 2 at different times.

Did you talk to your mechanic before/after you picked them up and question why they were machined to the levels they were and also what tolerance would be left???

You can be lucky sometimes and have them machined exceeding the minimum thickness but its not really recommended and most places would probably refuse to do so.

If your brakes are set up correctly then you shouldn't have to worry about the rotor for a while so chances are your not even going to own the car by the time they have to be machined again due to wear and tear anyhow :domokun:

I should probably explain a bit more, they vibration is definitely only cause by the grooves, and not because the disk was warped/runout whatever.. The disks are only a few months old, while i was driving a few weeks ago the pad material tore off the backing plate after which the backing plate came in contact with the disk and created the grooves. As soon as it happened i stopped the car and got it towed home.

Before that incident, the disks were absolutely perfect, no vibration whatsoever, and as i said, nearly brand new.

When i dropped the disks off one was 29.95mm and the other which had the grooves was 29.74 as measured in the grooved area. When i picked them up the good one was 29.18 and the grooved one was 28.99.

So not only did they machine slightly more off the one that was perfect, they are different thicknesses. It seems they just picked approx 0.75mm out of their arse and decided to chop that much off both without any thought.

I specifically told them when i dropped them what happened, and made sure they understood that they should only take the absolute minimum off. When i picked them up i expressed my concerns on why so much had been taken off and they just like well thats how much was required which seems to me complete BS.

I notice the degradation in braking performance as the disk thins out and i go through brakes reasonably quick anyway so it is a concern for me ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...