Jump to content
SAU Community

Z32 Igniton Dwell Duty


Recommended Posts

Interesting,

Didn't think this topic would surface again.

I had the too many points in my charts before ^^60 not ^^6F, there are only 16 points not 32 thus the rpm scale is in 400 rpm increments.

The divide by 10 to convert to dwell % was gleened for some ecu tuning forum somewhere.

This appears not to be the case thankfully as 25.5% seemed to be max dwell duty % before.

so i guess i need to work out the constant to convert from ecu values in dec to dwell duty %.

will post back later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Bump.

I know this thread is old, but I'm going to be doing an LS2 coil swap in favour of the garbage RB20 coils I'm running on my RB30.

Can anyone explain the correlation between dwell duty cycle and actual dwell time so i can set them up properly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bump.

I know this thread is old, but I'm going to be doing an LS2 coil swap in favour of the garbage RB20 coils I'm running on my RB30.

Can anyone explain the correlation between dwell duty cycle and actual dwell time so i can set them up properly?

They are 2 different things. If frequency didn't change then there would a correlation between the 2 but because frequency increases (with RPM), then duty cycle must increase to achieve the same ON time (in milliseconds) in order to reach coil saturation.

The pic shows that duty cycle has to increase as rpm increases, simply because we have less time.

post-536-1286344473_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah ok... Makes sense. Do you know if i can even adjust actuall dwell to suit other coils then with nistune?

That pic i posted was from nistune. You can adjust it, but if you add too much duty cycle you will just burn out coils.

Millisecond adjustments with nistune are simply to compensate for lower battery voltages. Duty cycle adjustments are for the on time, which will increase as rpm rises.

Easiest way to find out what is required is to hook coil up to a scope, you will see when full saturation is acheived because current will stop climbing and level out.

Otherwise, provided the primary winding are resistances are massively dissimilar, i would just leave them.

Edited by kjb_r33
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That pic i posted was from nistune. You can adjust it, but if you add too much duty cycle you will just burn out coils.

Millisecond adjustments with nistune are simply to compensate for lower battery voltages. Duty cycle adjustments are for the on time, which will increase as rpm rises.

Easiest way to find out what is required is to hook coil up to a scope, you will see when full saturation is acheived because current will stop climbing and level out.

Otherwise, provided the primary winding are resistances are massively dissimilar, i would just leave them.

Thanks a lot man you've been super helpful. The thing is, I'm going from R32 coils to LS2 coils which have a WAY higher spark energy and a significantly different dwell time (I think), I guess I'll just play with it slowly. Heres some interesting data on the coils I'm using: http://www.megamanual.com/seq/coils.htm

Do you know what the "nominal dwell" would be on the stock coils?

Edited by ST240
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot man you've been super helpful. The thing is, I'm going from R32 coils to LS2 coils which have a WAY higher spark energy and a significantly different dwell time (I think), I guess I'll just play with it slowly. Heres some interesting data on the coils I'm using: http://www.megamanual.com/seq/coils.htm

It actually states on there to use no more than 6 milliseconds. It also states that the millisecond compensation is for dropping battery voltages. (both can be adjusted with nistune).

Id be inclined to get them wired up, then adjust the dwell duty cycle to achieve the 6ms.

This will give you max coil output at a duty cycle thats not going to shorten coil life excessively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • A euro that old, I'd change the bearings anyway. But definitely lift the wheel and give it a wobble.
    • You're onto something here... Maybe that's his plan all along, he's just pretending to leave it stock then nek minnit, LS Bogan MX5
    • He could just take the Bogan Cruise Ships setup... Already got a good setup, with blower, the auto was rebuilt too wasn't it? Perfect time for him to upgrade the tailshaft, diff, and axles...    And wouldn't need to waste money on redoing the Commos seats, as he could just buy race seats for the 5...   As a highly modded car he could avoid the ability to give it away to offspring too when they crash their cars...
    • It's really interesting how much it's moving left to right, and doesn't appear to be actually spreading. For this to be moving left to right, without flaring, means unequal forces being applied until equilibrium hits in one way or another.   Reasons it could be unequal; Piston sizes left to right are different sizes. Only minute differences. Pistons moving on different planes. That is, are they moving directly straight at each other, or slightly out of alignment. The fluid is restricted getting to one side.   Some tests you could do. Pull the bleeders on the left and right, fit each side with pressure gauges. It will allow you to make sure pressure is equal (and really, it should be as fluid flow is so damn low, so fluid flow dynamics shouldn't come into it).   With the calipers off the car, have both sides retracted as far as possible, measure very very accurately (think micrometre) distances between opposing pistons in four different spots per set of pistons. Firstly, on each opposing pistons pair, the measures on for different spots should be equal. If it's not, and especially if one spot appears to actually get closer compared to another, the pistons aren't aligned, and now the forces left to right won't be equal, as they're the forces fighting each other.   You can also pull all the pistons out, and very very accurately measure the diameter of them. If they're not equal left to ight in the pairings, and especially if the area of the pistons on one side is different to the area on the other overall, it'll all be out of whack.   My bet, is shit QC in making sure the pistons move in the same plane left vs right. Some minor out of square machining, and nothing will line up, things will want to move around.  
    • Whilst putting a V8 in a MX5 would be fun, it would negate the whole cheap to run fun daily that the MX5 will be used for If I wanted a faster little convertible I would have got a engine check light, I mean a BMW Z4 M, but going off the issues that the guy at work who recently got one is having, it is lucky I didn't  Meh, horses for courses, the Bogan Cruise Ship is my go to for some horse torques    
×
×
  • Create New...