Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

This is a question that is very vague to answer, and it also a question that doesnt really matter. According to some stuff that ive read, the power at the wheels is 80 - 85% what it is at the engine. Still this is just an estimate, and like I said, who really cares ...

Oh, in case you dont know the kw - bhp conversion .. its x 1.341 ... so if you have 245 kW at the wheels, you have about 328 rwhp. Not that that really matters either .. its just a measurement and i rekon ppl often quote it just cause its a bigger number and sounds better ... but not always.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18093-horsepower/#findComment-377916
Share on other sites

There is no definitive equation for determining flywheel horsepower from rear-wheel horsepower.

InExtremis you said that you believed it was 80-85%, well i heard it was between 67-75% (2/3 and 3/4), so that proves that it depends on multiple variables. All wheel drives also lose much more power through drivetrain loss. Ill outline a few variables that i know of but someone with dyno experience can elaborate:

* wheel/tyre size

* how well the car puts its power down

* weight distribution

In the latest MOTOR mag they had a Holden v Ford comparison and dynoed all 7 cars. Some interesting results:

* FPV GT = 290Kw@fly but made 225Kw@wheels

* HSV GTS = 300kw but made 222Kw@wheels

* Holden Caprice = 245Kw@fly but made only 158Kw@wheels

* Commodore SS = 235Kw@fly but made 182Kw@wheels

* Commodore SV8 = 235Kw@fly but made 178Kw@wheels

As you can see descrepancies are apparent in these examples. One phenomenon did occur to me the cars that performed best had more weight over the rear axles...

Hope this helps...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18093-horsepower/#findComment-378476
Share on other sites

For dyno-testing yes more more weight in the back will give better results (generally speaking) for RWD cars. Thats why sometime you see guys sitting in or on the boot of cars being dynoed!!!!

As for on the road, there is a fine line between good power down and bogging, and more finely adding extra weight to aid power down and the detriment of having a heavier car (the heavier the car the worse power to weight ratio).

Think of a leaf sprung suspension equiped ute with big horsepower. There's 3/5ths of stuff all weight in the back therefore there is going to be a difficulty in putting the power to the ground because the tyres wont be sitting as heavily on the road...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18093-horsepower/#findComment-378713
Share on other sites

only bad thing with this info is.... you are assuming that they are actually the quoted figure @ fly. Figures could well be totally correct, and what im saying would have no relevance.. but it may not be the case .

Originally posted by HSVKLR

In the latest MOTOR mag they had a Holden v Ford comparison and dynoed all 7 cars. Some interesting results:

* FPV GT = 290Kw@fly but made 225Kw@wheels

* HSV GTS = 300kw     but made 222Kw@wheels

* Holden Caprice = 245Kw@fly but made only 158Kw@wheels

* Commodore SS = 235Kw@fly but made 182Kw@wheels

* Commodore SV8 = 235Kw@fly but made 178Kw@wheels

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18093-horsepower/#findComment-379160
Share on other sites

Roughly the number of horsepower at the rear wheels is the same number of kW's at the flywheel.

so in butthead's case 245rwkw = 327rwhp

therefore if the car has 327rwhp, the engine produces 327kW (436hp) at the flywheel (roughly)

i dont think this would apply to all cars but seems to be pretty close on rwd skylines.

hope that helps....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18093-horsepower/#findComment-379697
Share on other sites

Haha no worries InExtremis - it's interesting that they did an article with dyno results of all our "favourite" australian cars.

Just out of interest the XR6T which won the comparison for best all round ability made 185Kw@wheels... not bad eh?!! They even made mention of the "R32 Skyline" in the article - saying not since then has a 6cyl decimated the opposition in such a way....

Btw RB25 i like your formula in working it out - very interesting but if you apply it a stock R32 GTSt see what happens:

Roughly 110kw@wheels=147.4hp@wheels

therefore 147kw@flywheel (158/162kw stock)

Almost but not quite....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/18093-horsepower/#findComment-379853
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, next the shroud needs to come off and there are a couple of tricks. Firstly, there is a loom from near the passenger side headlight to the fans, coolant temp sensor etc and there is no plug to undo.  In my case I was OK to leave the shroud on top of the engine so I just undid the passenger side fan plug and about 10 of the clips which gave enough free wire to put it aside. The fan plugs were super tight, the trick I used was a small falt screwdriver to push down on the release tab, then a larger flat screwdriver to lever the plug out of the fan unit....be careful with how much force you apply! If you need to remove the shroud altogether for some reason you will have to deal with all the plugs (tight) and clips (brittle)....good luck. I removed all of the clips and replaced them with cable ties that I will just cut next time. Also, in the Red Sport / 400R at least, the intake heat exchanger reservoir hose is bolted to the shroud in 2 places with 10mm headed bolts; so remove them (the hose stays in the car; no need to undo it at the t fittings down at the radiator lower mount. Once you've dealt with the HX hose and the wiring loom, there are 3x 10mm headed self tappers holding the top of the shroud to the radiator; remove those.   The shroud then lifts out of the bottom mounts where it sits on the radiator, up and onto the engine out of the way. Simples
    • Ok, disregard my “rate them” comment, sorry for my unrealistic input
    • OK, now we are ready to get started. You need to remove the air boxes on each side for clearance. The cover is straightforward, undo the clips on the top and lift the front cover out of the rest of the housing. If it is tight you can remove the air filters first. The rear section of the airbox is trickier. On each side you need to remove the Air flow meter wiring which is held to the airbox with a clip; you need to get behind the clip on 2 sides if you want to remove it without breaking it - unclip the harder side and pull on the clip with medium force, then unclip the easier side and it should pop out The airbox is held onto the intake hose with a spring clamp; you need to get a flat bladed screwdriver behind the spring on both sides and pop them outwards. When you have got them in the right unclipped place they will stay there and the airbox slips out pretty freely. Put a rag in the intake to prevent anything getting dropped in there, and also to prevent you seeing that the turbo seal is leaking oil (as they do). Then. The top of the radiator is held by a steel plate, it is secured by 2x10mm and 2x12mm headed bolts . Remove them and remove the plate Also grab the bushings that hold the radiator to the plate on each side so they are not lost!
    • Next, remove the upper and lower radiator hoses, both are held with a spring clamp. While you are under there, tackle the Auto Trans cooler lines.  Again both are held on with spring clamps, and as mentioned above you should cap them on the radiator side with an 8mm cap, and on the car side loop them with a length of 8mm pipe - this will stop you losing a dangerous amount of AT fluid during the rest of the job If you've been meaning to add a sender for AT trans temp, this is a great time to do it; put a sender fitting into the passenger side line as that is the inlet to the cooler/radiator.
    • Next you need to remove the intake duct (as with pretty much every job on these cars), it is a series of clips you gently remove with a flat bladed screwdriver. They do get brittle with time and can break, and I have not found a decent quality aftermarket one that fits (they are all too soft or flimsy and don't last either) but the nissan ones are a couple of bucks each (ouch).  Once the clips are off (either 8 or 10, I didn't check) you lift the intake duct out and will see the reservoirs Undo the line into the radiator side cap (some bent needle nosed piers are awesome for spring clamps) and then remove the 4x 10m nuts that hold both in place.  I didn't get these pics, but remove the line under the radiator reservoir (spring clamp again) then remove that reservoir. Then you can get at the intake reservoir, same thing, spring clamp underneath then remove it. BTW This is a great time to put in a larger (+70%) combined reservoir that AMS makes..... https://www.amsperformance.com/product/q50-q60-red-alpha-coolant-expansion-tank/ They also make an Infiniti branded and part# version if that is your thing
×
×
  • Create New...