Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OKay before you guys start on the BOV jokes lol theres a really weird noise coming from my r33 upon start up thats got me a lil worried.

Anyways to fill you in I took the car on a lil bit of a drive the other night through the dandedongs and what not and well essentially gave her a decent work out..

Anyways only since then I've heard what appears to be the sound of air escaping (loud like trucks air brakes loud) upon starting the car and beginning to drive this usually happens when the car has just started in motion, and has occured whilst driving or in reverse..the noise only happens the once and if I turn the car off and on it won't do it.. I guess it only really occurs after its been sitting for a while.. Does anyone have any ideas??

To me it sounds like some sort of pressure release but for the life of me I have no idea why...THANKS in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190488-weird-sound-from-my-r33/
Share on other sites

Iv come accross that also, i notice a loud hissing when i pull into garage afta goin for a spin, i checked all my vaccum lines n everythn cudnt hear or feel any air escaping. I rekon its my fan or something around that area? Are you boosting ok n does it idle normaly?

Boost fine and idle hasnt change.. it doesnt do it under load and only does it like the once on start up today I left it to idle for 15minutes before I took it for a drive and it only made the noise as I reversed from the driveway..

I would but its a kind of hard thing to explain when the car only does it sometimes on start up.. and I dont even know where the sound comes from if you get what I mean... Thats why I thought I'd ask on here first incase and of you guys had experienced a similar problem..

sounds like wat my bros 34 GT did

only on startup it would make some kind of hissing noise for a few seconds then that was it

he changed the oil, which by the looks of it had never been changed by the previous owner

and its was all fine hasnt made it since.

thanks guys ill try kinda hard when it only does it occasionally but ill try.. it literally sound like airbrakes going off on a truck (that kinda high pitched hiss) and happens from the front of the vehicle.. it hasnt done it yet today..but probably will tonight its really weird lol theres no like pressure release system built in anywhere ive never heard of is there??

im not sure too but since the car was sitting ideling this morning i've kinda been thinking it might be coming from the steering somewhere...since it didnt happen on idle.. maybe it when i turn the wheel for the first time??

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...