Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i always thought it was:

FWD is around 10-15%.

RWD is around 15-25%.

AWD/4WD is around 20-30%.

but this also all depends on if its an auto or a manual.

Well 206kw R34s godown to about 150rwkw. Take off about 60kw

300kw HSVs dyno at about 225rwkw. In this case 75kw

going off these figues they are both around 25%

Where do people keep getting these ideas about drive train losses being a percent?

Example:

my GTT is making 1000kw at the fly wheel and you say i'm losing 30%. That gives me 700kw at the wheels.

300kw loss through the drive train. That would mean your 335kw GTT motor wouldn't be able to turn the back wheels on my GTT because all your power is being consumed by my drive train. But the drive train is identical.

Your GTT lost 85kw

My GTT lost 300kw

how do you explain that??

Drive train loses are NOT calculated by pertanges.

If the HSV lost 75kw and it's a manual and your GTT is a manual, same size wheels, blah blah blah, you will lose about 75kw. Or better still if someone is saying that a 206kw GTT mays 150kw at the wheels (56kw loss), guess what, your 335kw will lose about 56kw.

Edited by Public Enemy
that a 206kw GTT mays 150kw at the wheels (56kw loss), guess what, your 335kw will lose about 56kw.

Agree with Drivetrain loses are NOT calculated by percentages.

In this case probably a little more I would say 60-65kw loss, partly due to increased heat from the extra power.

The issue of drivetrain loss has been discussed thoroughly before in this thread:http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/25...Kw-t169392.html

Agree with Drivetrain loses are NOT calculated by percentages.

In this case probably a little more I would say 60-65kw loss, partly due to increased heat from the extra power.

The issue of drivetrain loss has been discussed thoroughly before in this thread:http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/25...Kw-t169392.html

yeap i wouldn't argue with that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Legend. I ended up finding the facebook account of the owner of the first car i sent but sadly he deactivated the account. I think you’re right in saying it’s some sort of well done custom job. Really appreciate your help anyways.
    • Totally equivalent. Stock often goes from the comp cover because that's where the actuator is also installed and the factory needs 2" of hose to make the connection - and it comes as a pre-assembled unit. They totally have a boost reference from somewhere between the turbo and the throttle(s). Oh, jeez. Just do it in M12 then. We don't actually care that much. I would expect any such AN converter fitting to rely on an o-ring or some other seal onto a flat surface under the flange of the hex**, because bolt threads are no intended to provide a pressure seal. unlike..... pipe threads. **which also requires a suitably flat and smooth surface on the turbo's boss to provide the seal.
    • I also used NP   That’s were it’s seems to be the best place to fit it? All schematic shows also that it’s should be referenced from the turbo housing. But idk, I do see high hp cars without any connection or anything to their turbos, so I really don’t know how they connect their things
    • I do have loctite 243 and 246 and a few more models. I could drill it now in place and make new threads for m12 and order an4 - m12 coupling and fit that to the turbo. Run a braided hose to the EBC which I could get a an4 to 1/8npt 
    • So M12 and sealant should be fine?    NPT ” because that’s what I had and what I could get atm. 
×
×
  • Create New...