Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well one thing i noticed with the new s50 is (after owning both tomtom and navman) is that it has a milage log book in it! this is good if you use your car work work and play... otherwise the tomtom is the go for sure!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194976-tomtom-v-navman/#findComment-3494026
Share on other sites

tomtom has a very nice user interface, mush nicer to look at and use in my opinion

but don't forger the garmin models - some have software that actually says street names out to you - this is pretty rare in the GPS market and well worth it imo

(i have tomtom on my PDA and i'm about to get a hardwired garmin unit in my V35)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194976-tomtom-v-navman/#findComment-3495642
Share on other sites

I sell them as i work at JB Hi Fi .. i would recommend the tom tom ... much easier user interface and it has advance planning feature ... this gives you pc software to easily plan trip then loading the file to your favourites on the unit.....

However the S50 navman has bluetooth handsfree built in .... depends which features you need..

but if i was choosing on basic ease of use ... i would go the tom tom for sure

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194976-tomtom-v-navman/#findComment-3497064
Share on other sites

hmm, cheers for the feedback guys, tomtom seems to be the pick of the bunch atm, but i do like some of the navman features,

if i could affor to go more expensive i believe both of the higher models in the tomtom and navman ranges have the feature that reads street names out, but atm thats not an option, and not that much of a priority however cool :(

might have to do a lil more comparing still

thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194976-tomtom-v-navman/#findComment-3499818
Share on other sites

i would have to add... that for best gps performance, garmin are the winners there. i miss my old c310!

the best feature of the streetpilots is the auto turn on and off feature as per the ACC position! why dont the others have that?!?!?!?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194976-tomtom-v-navman/#findComment-3499826
Share on other sites

if anyone knows anything of both or either models battery life, that would be good too, i realise they both come with car chargers, but jus so i know.

the Navman site says it has a life of approximatly 5 hrs while the tomtom site says 2 hrs

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194976-tomtom-v-navman/#findComment-3500243
Share on other sites

I've had the TomTom ONE XL since it's release early this year. I am happy to say it is the best GPS unit I have ever used, in terms of accuracy, ease of use and interface-appeal. However, it's battery doesn't seem to last all that long. I usually have it stuck in the car-charger.

BTW, I picked up the unit for $499 when it came out! (RRP $599)

Edited by HUAWEI
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/194976-tomtom-v-navman/#findComment-3500517
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...