Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey ahmed you know how i was looking for these for like 6 months i found one!!!.....some guy imported a skyline with 1 hedlight a s1 and one a s2 and thank the son of rajab the side that was the s2 was wat i needed so i did a straight swap for a s1 hedlight....man its sooo hard to get these maybe you should just order it from nissan brand new??

if u like to pay $650 a pop from Nissan i'd agree with vendetta - i broke both of mine about two weeks ago in a bingle and just had to phone all the wreckers i could - i think the cheapest came to about the $350 mark and that's second hand - i feel for anyone that's had to go and find some at a reasonable price, there like liquid gold as one of the wreckers told me!!!

i'll Pm u some names of some of the guys who were willing to help me out with either numbers of people who had some for sale or have connections to wreckers - just give that a go.....

that 350 was that series 2 lights.........they might have prices but the thing is do they have it in stock or if not can they even find one in japan......series 1s are easy to find..if u guys need help there are ppl in adelaide that have them.......yeh s2 lights are like liquid gold....the cheapest i found s2 lights were 320 each but he went to japan couldnt even find any like i said i waited 6 freakin long months!!!

thanks tony!!!

look forward to your email :D

the $350 was for s1 headlights, didn't bother asking for s2 as i would have to change my bonnet as well. That was the general price from almost all the wreckers in Melbourne, and the ones that i knew that sold them cheaper - didn't have any left, all had been stolen of their half-cuts in Japan...... lousy if u ask me :D

Never thought about S.A. - should be much easier to get cheaper headlights from there - Hope u the best in luck!!! :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...