Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Oh, one other thing about my turbo - the "bodgy" bit about the install wasn't the turbo itself, but rather the weak spring used to pull back the sticky wastegate pivot, as well as the welded-up and cut pivot. Once this is fixed I won't need the extra external spring and it won't look bodgy anymore :( It is a standard T04E turbo.

Actually Jay, you're the first person to ask :( This is probably because before today, I didn't even know what my turbo was. The engineer guy at Garrett instantly identified it as a T04E without even noting anything unusual about it, so I'd say it's the full standard unit and not a T3/4 hybrid. The previous owner advertised it as a "450hp T04" but I forgot to ask any more details about it before buying the car.

I've always liked this turbo, but there's nothing else I can compare it to really (aside from some poxy TX3 turbos I've driven from waaaay back). Benm's car with the factory turbo was slightly faster than mine when I got it, but he had a better intercooler and air filter. Since I upgraded my cooler and plenum I'd say they are at least on par again, and now I can also run higher boost due to the steel wheels.

My turbo seems to start spooling fairly low (maybe 2000rpm?) but it doesn't seem to hit maximum boost until 4500rpm or so. I always thought this was an anomoly of the turbo, but now I've found that the wastegate wasn't working properly it could just be that.

I'll re-evaluate it again once the wastegate is fixed. Maybe it is a lag monster relatively speaking, but it doesn't seem to bother me. I can still pull up a hill in 5th gear with a carful of passengers, so it must be doing something at lowish revs.

Hehe...cool. It doesn't seem like a lag monster if it's making boost around 2000rpm...that's actually very responsive. I used to have a GT3037S on a 2L and that was laggy, like no boost until around 3500rpm!! Too laggy for street use, but when it came on boost it was great ;) I think I'll try the GT2835PRO S for my next 2L.

Well that's the thing - it always felt like it was making boost early, but with my foot to the floor, it never got to full boost until around 4500rpm (maybe 5000). Going from what other people have posted here it should have been 500-1000rpm earlier than that to be considered an "early boost" type turbo.

I won't mind if it's around the same after it comes back, it was a gradual transition to max boost rather than a punch in the kidneys.

Fixing the wastegate should at least reduce the strain on my poor EBC, which has been fighting against this sticky pivot for well over a year now. If it brings full boost on earlier then that's a bonus.

Well you can definitely feel it kick in, a lot more than getting to the sweet spot on a lumpy cam on a NA engine (as I get on my bike). It's just not as harsh as some cars I've been in, which makes cornering a little more predictable.

I dunno, "feeling" of turbos kicking in is very subjective. One person might think the turbo kick is excessive, when another will think that the car doesn't even have a turbo. If we are ever at the same cruise I'll take you for a spin and you decide :D

Yeah, it is subjective I guess. I've heard that some RWD cars running large turbos tend to wheel spin when the turbo kicks in. Can get very dangerous in the wet, but if this happens, you know that it's a pretty big thump! :D

Never been in a car that does this, because my car is AWD and traction is rarely a problem. Though my sister has a stock s15 and it feels a lot more dangerous in the wet, even when my car had 206kW at all four wheels. It's really easy to get the rear end outwards when turning a corner (s15). And I can imagine it would be very difficult to control with 200+KW at the rear wheels. But I guess 10" width rims would give a little more traction...

I got the turbo back this morning and put it back in the car this afternoon, it was a lot easier than taking it off because I knew where everything went and where to get the spanners in.

Including getting everything like the exhaust sealing compound on it took me around an hour. The whole wastegate was replaced, apparently the old one was pretty stuffed. The new one operates very smoothly and with no freeplay at all.

I noticed that the spacer for the turbo mounting isn't normal because it causes the nuts to not go all the way down on the studs. I tried taking it out but then the turbo touches on the engine, so I put the spacer back in and did the nuts up a bit tighter than they were originally.

I haven't gone for a test drive yet because after all this I took the fuel pump out, but it all starts up and runs ok. I did a big coolant flush and put new coolant in and bled the system. The new fuel pump should be in tomorrow afternoon so I'll see how it goes after that.

Oh, the big thing - the rattling noise is now completely gone! Obviously the dud wastegate was the entire cause of the noise.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You Gregged a whole racetrack!?
    • Look for broken wire or bad connector at the motor. Might not be it, but is worth starting there, as it is easy.
    • Hi everyone, I’m having an issue with my R32 GT-R. Sometimes, when the car goes over a bump or experiences some vibration, the 4WD warning light comes on the dashboard. When I check the code from the control unit in the trunk, it shows Code 19 – ETS Motor. However, everything seems to be working fine — if I turn off the engine and restart the car, the light goes away and everything functions normally. Has anyone experienced this before? Where should I start troubleshooting this issue? Thanks in advance!
    • I'm back from the dyno - again! I went looking for someone who knew LS's and had a roller dyno, to see how it shaped up compared to everything else and confirm the powerband really is peaking where Mr Mamo says it should. TLDR: The dyno result I got this time definitely had the shape of how it feels on the road and finally 'makes sense'. Also we had a bit more time to play with timing on the dyno, it turns out the common practice in LS is to lower the timing around peak torque and restore it to max after. So given a car was on the dyno and mostly dialled in already, it was time for tweaking. Luis at APS is definitely knowledgable when it came to this and had overlays ready to go and was happy to share. If you map out your cylinder airmass you start seeing graphs that look a LOT like the engine's torque curve. The good thing also is if you map out your timing curve when you're avoiding knock... this curve very much looks like the inverse of the airmass curve. The result? Well it's another 10.7kw/14hp kw from where I drove it in at. Pretty much everywhere, too. As to how much this car actually makes in Hub Dyno numbers, American Dyno numbers, or Mainline dyno numbers, I say I don't know and it's gone up ~25kw since I started tinkering lol. It IS interesting how the shorter ratio gears I have aren't scaled right on this dyno - 6840RPM is 199KMH, not 175KMH. I have also seen other printouts here with cars with less mods at much higher "kmh" for their RPM due Commodores having 3.45's or longer (!) rear diff ratios maxing out 4th gear which is the 1:1 gear on the T56. Does this matter? No, not really. The real answer is go to the strip and see what it traps, but: I guess I should have gone last Sunday...
    • 310mm rotors will be avilable from Australia, Japan, and probably a few other places. Nothing for the front can be put on the back.
×
×
  • Create New...