Jump to content
SAU Community

rb26det vs rb26det

Guest skwertle

By Guest skwertle,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

Warpspeed Experienced

Warpspeed

Posted
Posted

Well thats not quite true. If you take just the short block, and replace the crank, rods, and pistons, you would still need to fit the GTR oil pump and water pump which are both different to the RB25 parts.

Up top, although the combustion chambers, ports, and valve sizes are the same, and the GTR head has no power advantage. But everything is totally different except maybe the cam drive sprocket on the exhaust cam, and the timing belt and idlers.

The RB26 has heavy duty parts throughout, and although a lot of things look the same, and fit, they are actually quite different.

RIPS Contributor

RIPS

Posted
Posted

DJ-L3ThAL, I don't quite know what your getting at??? (according to my thread name)???????

There is almost NOTHING even close to being the same between a R33 RB25det engine and a R32/33 RB26dett.

The blocks are different, The oil pumps are different, the heads are totally different, different port shape, different bolt pattern for inlet and exhaust manifolds, one has VCT the other does not, so I can't see why, being "my thread name" I should lie to skwertle and tell him there's NO difference????????

If he's talking about just a short block then he's going to need to get a block from a 4wd stagia, oil pump from a RB26dett etc etc.

Then, I think the head bolts are a different size so the block would still be different....Rob

Warpspeed Experienced

Warpspeed

Posted
Posted

I think the point here is that the two engines ARE totally different, but all the differences have to do with long term durability under extreme operating (endurance racing) conditions rather than actual power potential.

Yes the blocks are different. The difference is the GTR block has different oil pan rails for the 4WD sump, and an additional oil drain hole for the second turbo. There is no reason why an RB25 block would not be just as good, unless you wanted to run 4WD, then you might have a bit of a problem. All the moving parts interchange perfectly, and there is no strength difference.

The oil pump has a slightly larger displacement and runs dual springs in the pressure relief valve on the GTR. The only advantage of the larger pump is at idle, when you have a second turbo. A GTR road car may spend a considerable time idling, and the lower oil pressure might cause the oil light to come on if a smaller pump was fitted. At anything above idle, the relief valve will be open, and there will be full oil pressure. I am not sure why the GTR has dual springs in the pressure relief valve, but the only reason I can think of is reliability. The cost of the extra spring is SFA, so if there was a technical reason why it was better, all Skyline engines would probably have dual concentric springs fitted.

For flat out racing, a smaller displacement oil pump would work fine. It is only the road cars that really need the big pump !

The GTR water pump has a different impeller, but is otherwise identical. This is to allow higher sustained engine speeds without cavitating the pump. For anything but sustained racing conditions the RB25 pump will work fine, including drag racing. But if you are planning to hold full throttle for over a minute at 9,000RPM plus, the GTR pump is definitely the one to have.

I could go on about larger head bolts (10mm/12mm), sodium cooled exhaust valves, and solid tappet camshafts, but you get the general idea.

The manifold bolt patterns are very slightly different, but only so you can get a spanner onto the nuts with the two different manifold shapes. The port shapes sizes and locations are identical.

The power potential of the RB25 with identical external bolt ons (manifolds + turbos) would be the same. But for long distance endurance racing the RB26 would be going long after the RB25 died.

There is no doubt that he RB26 is a far better engine, but if you actually need all that stuff to drive around at less than 100Kmh is doubtful.

RIPS Contributor

RIPS

Posted
Posted

Have a look at the RB26dett head on the left and then have a look at the RB25det head on the right, DON'T LOOK THE SAME TO ME????????? Ports are totally different, manifold bolt pattern is totally different etc etc. But maybe I'm wrong I've only got about 20 heads here to compare IN THE FLESH, Check your heads and take a Photo and let me have a look.......Rob

RIPS Contributor

RIPS

Posted
Posted

SUMO look at the first post mate, 2.6 is the capacity of the engine, and I think he was refering to making a RB25det into a 2.6 liter by using a RB26 crank pistons and rods and he wanted to know if there was any other differences, and there sure are!!

You could make a RB26det with a RB25det block with RB26 crank,rods and pistons and use a RB25det top end and it would be a RB26. Just not a real RB26dett.............Thats what he was getting at.

Warpspeed Experienced

Warpspeed

Posted
Posted

Those ports look the same to me, allowing for the fact that the GTR head has had the valves removed which effects the lighting conditions.

Also the viewing angle is different. There is a difference around where the injector sprays, but the actual port and valve sizes are identical.

Its an interesting picture to be sure. I have an RB25 head and an RB26 inlet manifold here, and when I find time, intend to make up an adapter plate. Some of the studs line up, and so do the ports, but an adapter plate is still quite a bit of work. This has been done many times before by others and is well worth the trouble.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy
      R33 Fuel Pump & Brakes after alarm swap

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
    • Kinkstaah
      My BMW E39 528i touring

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      @PranK can you elaborate further on the Colorlock Dye? The website has a lot of options. I'm sure you've done all the research. I have old genuine leather seats that I have bought various refurbing creams and such, but never a dye. Any info on how long it lasts? Does it wash out? Is it a hassle? What product do I actually need? Am I just buying this kit and following the steps the page advises or something else? https://www.colourlockaustralia.com.au/colourlock-leather-repair-kit-dye.html
    • GTSBoy
      My BMW E39 528i touring

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      These going to fit over the big brakes? I'd be reeeeeeeeaaaall hesitant to believe so.
    • PranK
      My BMW E39 528i touring

      By PranK · Posted

      The leather work properly stunned me. Again, I am thankful that the leather was in such good condition. I'm not sure what the indent is at the top of the passenger seat. Like somebody was sitting in it with a golf ball between their shoulders. The wheels are more grey than silver now and missing a lot of gloss.  Here's one with nice silver wheels.
    • soviet_merlin
      My BMW E39 528i touring

      By soviet_merlin · Posted

      It's amazing how well the works on the leather seats. Looks mint. Looking forward to see how you go with the wheels. They do suit the car! Gutter rash is easy to fix, but I'm curious about getting the colour done.
×
×
  • Create New...