Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys not sure if i posted this up in the right place...

Need some help iv got a r33 gtst with a Apexi power FC computer if i was to replace it back with the stock computer

what will i need to do to my car to make it run right and also how much power will it loose I currently have (265rwph)...

Any info would be help thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/220521-computer-change-r33-gtst/
Share on other sites

Hey guys mods a as follows:

Front mount intercooler

T4 turbo not sure how big its rated at

straight through exhaust

Pod Filter

Dual stage TURBOSMART Boost controller with tornado switch in middle console

Driftf adjustable BOV

Fuel system and injectors stock...

Your car will lose signiicant power if the PFC is tuned for those modifications.

Also running the bigger turbo with stock management is a dangerous proposition unless you baby the car everywhere (dont go WOT or take the revves above about 3.5k) as you risk detonation and engine failure. If you put the stock turbo back on the car would run fine (if a little rich).

Why do you want to remove the PFC?

Thanks heaps guys for the quick repleys and help...

Not sure if im 100% gonna remove the Power fc but my brothers mate offered me $1200 for the computer and hand held controller but i'll probably just leave it the way it is cos i do love my car and dont have the money for any engine rebuild lol

Keep in mind if you can sell the PFC for 1200 and get a stock ecu thrown in you can get toshi (search the traders forum for 'toshi') to remap you standard ECU for around $400 which is a very good option. It will be fine for the mods you have (and as its very hard to detect you wont get defected for it) the only downside is the PFC will be better if you want to do many more power mods in the future (bigger turbo, AFM, injectors, etc).

likely the car will run like a bag of shit with the ATMO BOV.

260rwhp is only 190rwkw, which for a turbo like that is a pretty poor result.

I'd expect closer to 300rwhp at least, and 350rwhp with injectors/AFM

So you wouldnt loose much power right power, would be a bit rougher to drive however as tune could have cleaned it up a bit

likely the car will run like a bag of shit with the ATMO BOV.

260rwhp is only 190rwkw, which for a turbo like that is a pretty poor result.

I'd expect closer to 300rwhp at least, and 350rwhp with injectors/AFM

So you wouldnt loose much power right power, would be a bit rougher to drive however as tune could have cleaned it up a bit

I was told that was about the right amount off power for the car as the injectors and fuel setup a still stock...

Also the t4 turbo i have isnt much bigger then the stock turbo, I'm not sure myself im only going on what the previous owner told me.

Its not about right :)

You can take factory injectors to around 220-230rwkw. Every car is different. I made 220rwkw on stock 25 injectors years ago with a T04e, int gated rear.

If its not visibly much bigger than the factory one, then it probably isnt a T04.

Generally a T04 will come with the .7A/R Garrett Comp cover

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you have a RB25DET NEO AWD motor, you will need this: https://www.hioctanedirect.com/ASR-RB26-RWD-Street-Comp-6.5L-Sump-Suit-R32/33/34-and-VL It is made for the AWD motor, but makes it fit a RWD setup and gives you a new pickup. Just one thing, the pickup sits quite forward, compared to a conventional RB25DET RWD motor. This may or may not have contributed to my previous AWD -> RWD shitting the bed at the track.
    • My car is also flex tuned. It's worth mentioning it (the LS1 ECU) has a 1D table for E85 addition and just uses the ethanol stoich part as the second point of reference. It also as a 3D timing map for Ethanol adjustment. You would think this isn't enough but it works pretty damn well. That said, I wouldn't want it in turbo application. It's like lifting non-natty, or taking meth. It gets you unrealistic results that break down more things going forward. If people used it to make the same amount of power they do on 98 then it'd be one thing. But people use it, crank it up to eleventy million PSI, it doesn't knock - but it pushes the point of failure to another, more expensive thing to break. Every time I see someone make 280kw on 98 and 350kw on E85 on the same equipment I just cry a bit and really wish they would just stay on 98 in that exact scenario. It's bad for you. 
    • This is kind of what I was thinking but the temp sender wire and the two pressure switch wires run through the starter subharnes and I eliminated the two pressure switch wires completely.  @GTSBoy I have a can gauge with unusually bright warnings should the oil pressure fall so the factory light isn't needed. I need to dig out my wiring diagram and see if I can sort this out.
    • It's a valid point. And it is doable with the Nistune. But I'm not inclined to flex it the way Nistune does - certainly not on a Neo ECU. They're already pernickety enough to tune just one one fuel. And of course, I'm not that interested in putting in a Link or similar, on a daily. With the stock ECU, stock looking turbo, etc etc, I still stand a chance of surviving a run-in with the plod. Last time it went over the pits (which was for the transplant, for because of a run-in with the plod), the Nistuned ECU did not even raise an eyebrow. They want to see a stock ECU running the engine, and they are happy to see it do so without the check engine light** on. Never mind that the Nistune is necessary to make the stock ECU work in a different chassis without ABS, TCS, etc. **And they actually provoke the CEL to come on by disconnecting the AFM, to prove that the globe hasn't been pulled!
    • This is why you flex fuel it...
×
×
  • Create New...