Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok here we go.. trying to do a bit of research on the ecu's.. am tossing up EMS, Power Fc, Haltech

ok now the power fc has 400 total fuel points and 400 ignition points for tuning.. now the EMS dual sport only has 48 and 48 points for tuning.. and the haltech has even more than power fc up to 704 points to be tuned..

now my question is .. how important are the amount of point available for tuning?? ive looked into the ems and its got some nifty features, eg NO AFM.. No more coil Packs data logging and tuning with laptop.

i really got no idea which direction to head with for this one.. also does anyone know if the new model power fc's do away with the AFM??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222-ecu-questions/
Share on other sites

is there any reason you wan to get rid of the afm?

I would get a power fc cause the cops can tell if its aftermarket that way you have a much great chance of not being caught and if you are caught you can just wind down the boost and plug in the stockie.

the z32 afm will handel at least 250 rwkw and then you can step up to the q45 one.

cheers

meggala

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222-ecu-questions/#findComment-9088
Share on other sites

megs, yeah i been through that site thats were my original data has been coming from..

i dont really know how important all those tuning points are or are thye just a wank?.. a couple ppl on sdu are saying go the haltech e6k..

though what u said about the power fc cop wise is a very good point.. and will most prob make me choose that option:(.. though that means ill still have mr afm :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222-ecu-questions/#findComment-9091
Share on other sites

mario made 800 hp using afms so don't stress.

it can actually give you better resoution with the afm than using map sensors.

250 rwkw is very doable check out zapf's car on sdu he made 240 on stock internals and 14 psi. the key is getting a turbo bigenough and using a plenium if you get a plenium get the trust one I know more dollars but they are worth it. he is using a 3037 or 40 not sure

If you can find space in the budget get the n1 pstions from a gtr and lower the comp ratio abit and use good rod bolts the key is to make the power with out stressing the motor if you have to ring out using 20psi or more your motor wont last. and you must do injectors

cheers

meggala

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222-ecu-questions/#findComment-9094
Share on other sites

yeah megs i was looking at a 3035 with 550cc injectors z32 and computer of some sort .. and maybe a metal headgasket to run a slightly lower compression.. that should get me the 250.. thats realisticly enough i believe.. traction is already a problem imagine what it will be with 250 at wheels..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/222-ecu-questions/#findComment-9095
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...