Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok guys i'm not usually an angry person but upon hearing the latest news i blew my top :(

Just heard on the news that since Mike Rann's government took over 6 years ago, 1.3 million people have been fined for "speeding" for driving between 61-69 km/h by the laws that they have passed. This equates to around 212 million dollars of bullshit revenue that they get from us. What this means is that you or someone you know has been a victim of their crimes against us drivers.

This personally affects me as i was caught couple of times for doing 67 and subsequently lost my licence because of it, and its not just me. These laws have cost many people i know their licences because of alleged "speeding".

Sorry guys, i'm not usually this political but it just gets my goat that i'm not even allowed to drive my car normally anymore. Its like every two seconds I have to look at the speedo to make sure i'm not doing 1km/h over 60. Do they expect us to all drive like granny's? God forbid that someone would walk out in front of me while doin 66, don't think my massive brembo's are up to the task of braking!

And that people is what grinds my gears!

(Mods please delete if this is below the belt)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

No i agree with him... i have noticed myself that i have become less attentive to the road and concentrating more on my speedo. So how is this going to help keep accidents down??

And they have never proven that there speed cameras are 100% acurate... So there using somethinf they know could be wrong but are happy to do so...

Edited by Adz2332
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3958358
Share on other sites

But thats exactly my point. They keep moving around what they consider to be speeding and it messes everyone up. When i started driving it wasn't heard of for getting fined for anything under 70. Now you just have a slight lapse in judgement and boom, your gone.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3958367
Share on other sites

yeah its interesting that they began to clamp down more & more on speeds when they decided that Port Wakefield Rd needed a major facelift and that we needed an underpass on South Rd/Anzac Hwy!

Having said that, you won't get busted for 61 or 62 kph, I think the 10% rule still applies in SA unlike VIC that has a 5% rule now.

If you got a ticket for under 65kph I would be surprised if you couldn't argue before a magistrate that your speedo is out that far.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3958388
Share on other sites

well rules are rules! they set them and we have to abide by them! even though it doesn't seem fair but when has it ever been fair? well probably a good time to get cruise control and a speed check because you never know! your speedo might say you're doing 60 but you could be doing 61

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3958391
Share on other sites

To much has been said lately about hoon drivers, speeding etc etc. The death toll will never be zero. Doesnt matter what they do. Every year more cars are on the road. Cars are getting older with new cars less affordable. And dont even get me started about the condition of the roads we drive on. So you cant honestly tell me they think by lowering the speed in which we get fined at will combat all of this and decrease the road toll..... how stupid do they think we are! lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3958392
Share on other sites

I read that too... the statistics are frightening!

60-69km/h Fines went up from

1515 Offences in 2002 to

100,800 Offences in 2007.

My god!!! Tell me, is the whole population speeding more, or is the government seeing an opportunity for a money grab. That's bs. And it's not just that too... do 35km/h approaching an RBT zone and you'll get pinged as RBT zones even though not signed are 25km/h.

How is this improving public safety... ??? Sorry Rann but you're out in my books in 2010.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3958410
Share on other sites

When you fit rims / wheels, the ADR requirement in SA is that the speedo must be accurate to 10% or something like that (have a printout in my car). So say your in a 60 zone, doing 65, technically speaking thats not illigal as it could just be the innacuracy of your speedo, and you werent "aware" that you were speeding. Also, it used to be, and I dont know why they changed it, that you couldnt get fined if you were withing that 10% margin.

Personally I think its absoloutely bullshit that they fine you if your doing 61-65 in a 60 zone. I mean heck, it could be a split second when ur on a negative slope and yet you get done for it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3958546
Share on other sites

They're still just lowering speed limits all over Adelaide and sticking speed cameras there with the intention of catching out 'unobservant drivers'. Not 'speeding drivers', but 'unobservant drivers'.

I don't care what they call it, its REVENUE RAISING plain and simple. They don't really want us to be safer drivers, because when we do slow down and their revenue drops, they start lowering speed limits again and sticking cameras everywhere. They WANT us to be criminals. If we don't, they work out strategies to increase the number of speeding drivers. Remember the introduction of the bullshit 50kph limit? They introduced that one when revenue was declining!

:P

Edited by RubyRS4
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3958812
Share on other sites

yeah its interesting that they began to clamp down more & more on speeds when they decided that Port Wakefield Rd needed a major facelift and that we needed an underpass on South Rd/Anzac Hwy!

Having said that, you won't get busted for 61 or 62 kph, I think the 10% rule still applies in SA unlike VIC that has a 5% rule now.

If you got a ticket for under 65kph I would be surprised if you couldn't argue before a magistrate that your speedo is out that far.

Think the 10% rule has changed here as well, not 100% sure on that...Just came back from Victoria a couple of weekends ago, and my dad's cousin who we spent a fair bit of time with is an ex cop and his wife is a cop and they don't have a % rule its 3km's over the limit thats it pinged...

Thing i don't get is we have an ADR rule that says your speedo must be accurate to within 10% of the nominated speed sign...Now apparently the state governments have decided they rule the roost and they've set their own % for speedo accuracy?? Doesn't sound right does it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3958893
Share on other sites

I always thought dont speed dont get caught. ...well I was caught a couple weeks back doing 60km in a 50km zone, there was a paddock one side and just some old houses on the other side. wide open road. how was I supposed to know it was a 50km zone ? people could go down this road at 2345346km hour. :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3958933
Share on other sites

To much has been said lately about hoon drivers, speeding etc etc. The death toll will never be zero. Doesnt matter what they do. Every year more cars are on the road. Cars are getting older with new cars less affordable. And dont even get me started about the condition of the roads we drive on. So you cant honestly tell me they think by lowering the speed in which we get fined at will combat all of this and decrease the road toll..... how stupid do they think we are! lol

Agreed. The death toll has remained fairly static around 100 but population has risen and cars have got safer etc. Never will be zero... purely revenue raising on straight roads in low speed zones. Should be blackspot only.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/224753-rann-rant/#findComment-3959558
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...