Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 188
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

its a downgrade in model, theres no denying that. So for you 33 haters, SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

+1 for 33 haters... some people prefer the OLDER shape... so what! Is it newer? no. did it come out after the R33 shape? no. is it an upgrade? no. there ARE those of us that prefer the R33 shape out there peoples!

..............Am I in a Skyline enthusiast forum or an "I hate R33's" forum? :(

i dont understand your reasoning kahli,you said it just gets damaged too much at school by jelous people,yet you have bought another skyline....and running costs,lol minimal difference if any between them.

is it just me or does this not make sence to anyone else ether? good on you for buying another one tho but i just dont understand the reasoning behind it.

+1 for 33 haters... some people prefer the OLDER shape... so what! Is it newer? no. did it come out after the R33 shape? no. is it an upgrade? no. there ARE those of us that prefer the R33 shape out there peoples!

..............Am I in a Skyline enthusiast forum or an "I hate R33's" forum? :(

I'd just say, an opinionated skyline enthusiast forum!

I like all Skylines (even the R30!) but I preffer the 32/34 shape... and so did Nissan! :P jk jk

Stagea's are heaps cheap now, like 10k for a series 1 rb25det auto awd.

awesome upgrade from a 33-32-s15.

I'll too have a pod to go to a new home next week, a K&N pod filter for a RB25det either stock or z32 afm

I'd just say, an opinionated skyline enthusiast forum!

I like all Skylines (even the R30!) but I preffer the 32/34 shape... and so did Nissan! :P jk jk

lol yes very openly opinionated

I definitely wouldnt mind removing my K&N pod too - less psh psh but the intercooler pipe is in the way of the snorkel for the stock air box dang it :(

its a downgrade in model, theres no denying that. So for you 33 haters, SHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

no, a downgrade would be going the turbo model down to a NA model.

this is a change in year of car so the term "downgrade" is invalid, especially when your moving to a lighter better performing car :(

+1 for 33 haters... some people prefer the OLDER shape... so what! Is it newer? no. did it come out after the R33 shape? no. is it an upgrade? no. there ARE those of us that prefer the R33 shape out there peoples!

..............Am I in a Skyline enthusiast forum or an "I hate R33's" forum? :(

You tell em Vu.

Damn 33 haters.

no, a downgrade would be going the turbo model down to a NA model.

this is a change in year of car so the term "downgrade" is invalid, especially when your moving to a lighter better performing car :(

Incorrect, if i went from a 32 to a 33, you'd say "nice upgrade". She has downgraded in years, theres no argument about it.

Incorrect, if i went from a 32 to a 33, you'd say "nice upgrade". She has downgraded in years, theres no argument about it.

lol i would say "ahhhh why would you do such a thing!??"

downgraded in years yes, but you didnt say that at the start :(

lol u guys are trippers.

gernerally 33's are better.. and not because of age, they got better brakes, suspension, larger engine (i wouldnt say better than RB20, but if u like less revs and more torque), upgraded interior, generally newer and longer lasting parts. only thing the 33 has going against it is the looks, looks very out dated.

anywho after all of that, i would still go a 32 :blink:

oh.. and just coz a car is newer doesnt make it better. thought some of u guys were smarter than that lol. i mean why get a 32 gtr.. get a vx commo, its newer and must be better right :P

Edited by steveP

LOL at steve :blink:

And +1 Jack...it doesn't make sense. If it was me i guess i'd just keep it till i could get the S15 right? And anyways. People at school are just jealous and they always will be whether its a 33, 32 or an S15. Just cos all they can afford is a commonwhore :P

i have a hks mushroom pod and with a few more psi than standard i feel it's pulling more air in than the apexi i had on! getting a flutter can also be done with an aftermarket bov, just tighten the spring a bit and you get the flutter at the same time a bit of air escaping! but even now i'm running the standard plumb back on my intercooler pipe because quite frankly it's been better than any bov's i've put on!

how come so much hatred for 33's? yes it's a whale but it still managed to lap the nurbuurgring 20 seconds faster than a r32! :blink:

ohh god

this arguement is going nowhere

it comes to personal preference

going from 32 to a 33 is an upgrade

going from 33 to a 32 is a downgrade

simple as that

Here we go!

argument.gif

:blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...