Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi, I have had some sveatty days working out with the rb25 gearbox. First time the two plates were not aligned so I couldn't even get the gearbox in and had to take it out again. This time the box went all the way in but now I can't get any gears in when the engine is on. I tried bleeding the fluids and adjusted the pedal as much as it goes. Then I lifted the rear up and started with a gear on, then the wheels spinned even with the pedal down. When I pushed the break and cluthc the rews went down a bit but the engine didn't stop. Could it be that I put one plate the wrong way? That could show some slipping, like what I have? Now the plates are not the same way. The plate closer the engine has the "outcoming" part in the middle facing the engine, and the plate closer the gearbox is the other way. Does anybody remember how they should be. Or is there maybe something else you could easily mess up in the installation since this was my first time :) . All I have is japanese instructions wich didn't help so much. Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233019-orc-709/
Share on other sites

Did you use the right bearing carrier? Have to decipher the instructions to figure out which one is right for you.

Sorry my english for the parts names isn't so good, but bearing carrier? I think it's the new part we changed with the bearing that I ordered with the clutch set from rhd japan. It is the part you attach to the bearing between the clutch and gearbox? It has the same effect you're right. I can send the japanese instructions if someone understands them. Yeah, by the way it is a dampered clutch if it has any difference. What is the right bearing carrier, have to check it out when I remove the gearbox... again.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233019-orc-709/#findComment-4087305
Share on other sites

By the sounds of it, I would have to agree with BNR#@.

It sounds like your bearing carrier is too short for your application, so that even at full throw the clutch isn't being disengaged.

Even though the manual is in japanese it isn't really hard to work out which one you need for your car.. numbers and pics make it easier to follow.

By the way, Thanks to Serg for helping out gavin at cypher with my clutch. Thanks heaps mate. I think they were under the impression that I didn't have the manual. Hopefully it is the nastiest clutch install that they have to deal with for a long time as it needed a pile of other bits replaced and a real bastard to fit it all back in.

Clutch bites like a bitch, but seems to be getting a bit nicer after a couple of days use. Zacka tuned it on thursday night and it made 350.6 rwhp @ ~17psi. All via hand controller too. Very happy.. for now.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233019-orc-709/#findComment-4087847
Share on other sites

post-43975-1219666533_thumb.jpgOkay, according to the picture the distance between the lines in the bearing carrier should be 14-16mm, agreed? I'll take the box out tomorrow and measure it. I just thought that the pieces would be right because they came in the same package, well you learn from your mistakes.... :D
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233019-orc-709/#findComment-4090939
Share on other sites

By the sounds of it, I would have to agree with BNR#@.

It sounds like your bearing carrier is too short for your application, so that even at full throw the clutch isn't being disengaged.

Even though the manual is in japanese it isn't really hard to work out which one you need for your car.. numbers and pics make it easier to follow.

By the way, Thanks to Serg for helping out gavin at cypher with my clutch. Thanks heaps mate. I think they were under the impression that I didn't have the manual. Hopefully it is the nastiest clutch install that they have to deal with for a long time as it needed a pile of other bits replaced and a real bastard to fit it all back in.

Clutch bites like a bitch, but seems to be getting a bit nicer after a couple of days use. Zacka tuned it on thursday night and it made 350.6 rwhp @ ~17psi. All via hand controller too. Very happy.. for now.

Haha, I was actualy there helping them lift the gearbox when they were trying to get it in with your front pipes still attached, not fun, bloody heavy bugger to... No matter how the box was angled it wasnt going in... The clutch does bite but you realy get use to it fairly fast, yours rattle to?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233019-orc-709/#findComment-4093061
Share on other sites

Rattle? hmm.. put it this way, my wife reckons that my car came back broken. :D

Bit of a zing when starting, and bit of a clunk when coming in to a stop with the clutch in like a uni-joint type of noise. Pedal effort is almost half of what the original one was, a heavy duty single I am led to believe.

Gavin found out how much fun it was to try and refit the front pipe to those dump pipes as well, it took me about 3 hours to do it myself on the shed floor the first time..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233019-orc-709/#findComment-4093166
Share on other sites

Rattle? hmm.. put it this way, my wife reckons that my car came back broken. :D

Bit of a zing when starting, and bit of a clunk when coming in to a stop with the clutch in like a uni-joint type of noise. Pedal effort is almost half of what the original one was, a heavy duty single I am led to believe.

Gavin found out how much fun it was to try and refit the front pipe to those dump pipes as well, it took me about 3 hours to do it myself on the shed floor the first time..

Haha, get use to explaining to everyone that it rattles because its so hardcore :)

Mine has a nismo slave cylinder so is light as a feather, would have actualy prefered it a bit heavy er but use to it now...

Was there when he was taking your fronts off, was gone by the time he was puting them back on, figured wasnt gona hang arround for the second round of lifting that box :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233019-orc-709/#findComment-4093315
Share on other sites

My friend had a similar problem, he found out that the tube which carries the bearing carrier pressed the clutch plate all the time. And that didn't allow it to release, he had to cut about 1cm of the tube away to get it to work. Have to check today if there is any signs of contact. The bearing carrier had the lenght that was adviced in the instructions, but still there is about 1,5cm loose in the fork movement before it started to push the clutch (before it got stiff). Is that okay?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/233019-orc-709/#findComment-4096781
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...