Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Item:Riverside rims, size is 18" width is 10" offset is +17

Age: Dont know

Condition: Very good apart from a few gutter marks which can be repaired for $60

Price: $400

To Fit: (What car) Any silvia, skyline, falcon ect with a 5x114.3 stud pattern

Location: City/Altona/Broady

Contact: 0406 974 904

Comments:

full set of these go for $1900, so a pair for 400 is cheap.

comes with 265s with roughly 50-70% tread

has a few gutter marks but i been quoted $60 to get it fixed but didnt bother as im running r33 gtrs now..

Pics (they are a bit dirty):

12082008011.jpg

12082008012.jpg

13082008001.jpg

13082008002.jpg

13082008.jpg

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/235462-riverside-18x10-17-pair/
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

sorry for the delay guys, still kinda unsure if i wanna sell them or not :rolleyes:

now comes with brand new 235/40/18s

more pics here:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/fi...t-p4144859.html

Edited by DjeMz
  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...