Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After having some oil sitting from the lower cooler piping, and having cleaned that up, it starts coming from the top return piping, I'm pretty sure my stock turbo is on it's way out.

Just wondering where, and roughlyyy how much rebuilding the stock turbo will cost. And how long does it take someone to do it, just so I have an idea to workout transport etc.

I'm not after an aftermarket turbo or more power, since I'm saving for my new toy and this car is most likely being sold to my friends mum next year (seriously), I just want to know what's the better way to go about it stock turbo-wise. Upon saying that, I MAY look into the aftermarket turbo scenario if the rebuilding is going to cost over $1,000.

I'll probably only get it done mid-november when I'm back but I want to get the budget sorted. Any help? Cheers. ;)

Edited by Magic
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/237774-rebuild-turbos/
Share on other sites

you are definitely looking over the 1.2k mark for a rebuild. You can ask performanz, i think they redid my turbos last time. The labour is usually about half of it and the other half going towards rebuilding. 2nd hand at this point if your plans are to sell is my opinion. As rev210 said you can probably get a 2nd hand one and put it on yourself which will save you alot.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/237774-rebuild-turbos/#findComment-4159412
Share on other sites

i looked into this jut recently as my turbo popped and went to heaven

its not worth rebuilding, it will cost over 1k and you can buy the same thing second hand for wayyyy cheaper

i have decided to go the upgrade as i want more power :D

but dont get it rebuilt or upgrade if you plan on selling soon as the turbo kit im getting is over $2500

turbos are not cheap ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/237774-rebuild-turbos/#findComment-4159427
Share on other sites

Oh ok. thanks for the info guys. hehe yeah Karl, I just spent over $3,000 on the WedsSport wheels and new rubbers that are being shipped atm, although it's only going to be on it with me for about 5 months-ish.. well that's the plan. Then I might buy another set with bigger offset for the new beast. ;)

So yeh looks like 2nd hand stock turb is the go.. next question... how will I know if I'm being sold an r33 rb25 or r34 rb25 turbo? is the size any different/markings etc? Obviously I don't want to downgrade..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/237774-rebuild-turbos/#findComment-4159574
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...