Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cmon we need more SAU people. We will have the minimum number, but there are over 300 SA SAU members - surely more people have to be interested in shooting others in the name of sport?

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cmon we need more SAU people. We will have the minimum number, but there are over 300 SA SAU members - surely more people have to be interested in shooting others in the name of sport?

*hopes steve is coming* :P

transferring deposit now andrew

Edited by craig R33

Andrew there is a Mallala track day (for bikes) coming up on the same day that I'd like to attend, but the race bike might not be ready.

This means I'm 75% in. If I'm not going to be on track, I'll def be in on the SAU Paintball Battle Royale!

Done paintballing before and its hell fun! :P And I just wanna shoot the .... :O

yeah just transfer me the $10 already .... it is not that hard :P

EVERY SAU event has a thousand people say they are coming, but then on the day every excuse under the sun comes up when they don't turn up. By paying a deposit you are 1. giving me a guarantee that we will have minimum numbers, and 2. that you actually turn up.

i can post in here from the comfort of my home. to deposit money i gota somehow cut time out of my day between work and uni and find a bank, get money out, and deposit it. i barely got time for lunch atm with work busy as. just seems too hard for such a simple thing.

Edited by steveP

+1 to what Heslo said .... even my Mum is tech-savvy enough to use internet banking ....

Don't worry mate, if you are 100% in, and I can take your word on that, then you can pay on the day. But, if you say you are coming, and I rely on that, and then you don't rock up, then we are going to have issues.

You may be a man of your word, but like I already stated, it is VERY frustrating for organisers of events to have a ton of people say on the forums yes, yes, yes, but then when it is time for the actual event have everyone pull out like a little bitch with every excuse under the sun. This event is already a good example - where in Eddy's original post there were well over 20 replies of 'yes I am in'- yet currently I have a whole 4 deposits (excluding my bunch of mates) ....

Cmon we need more people too - it is only $25 ffs - that is a $10 discount off the normal price, and you get to go on a 2 way Skyline cruise half way to Victor Harbor as well! I will be cooking up a barbie for lunch also ....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...