Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Should be an interesting year for GM and the other US makers according to this article....GM must really be stuffed (even more than they have been in the last few years) if GM can't even wait until Feb to be bailed out, which is only 10 weeks away.

It would really be a shame to see this impact our manufacturers since the Australian companies are actually producing a decent product these days.

http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0,23...from=public_rss

General Motors chief executive Rick Wagoner said the US automaker would need state help before Barack Obama takes over the White House in January, telling industry publication Automotive News that time was of the essence.

"This is an issue that needs to be addressed urgently," he said, calling on the Government to "overshoot, not undershoot" the level of assistance.

His call for support came as GM shares lost 23 per cent yesterday after analysts at Deutsche Bank said they expected the stock eventually to be worth nothing at all.

"Even if GM succeeds in averting a bankruptcy, we believe that the company's future path is likely to be bankruptcy-like," the bank said.

Mr Wagoner said the entire US auto industry was suffering, with sales expected to be down by more than three million vehicles next year in the face of the global economic downturn.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/244414-more-bad-news-for-gm/
Share on other sites

Combination of bad management, bad product and bad employee's are the downfall of this company.

They continue to produce large and expensive vehicles that consume plenty of fuel eg The new Hummer! is it really time to release high cost luxury vehicles at this time of bad credit.

People cannot afford to buy one and if they did, they couldnt take out a loan.

Plus the unions have GM by the balls so basically on average workers are getting 40bux an hour compared to the US BMW and nissan divisions in the south getting half that.

See the UK car manufacturing division back in mid to late 1900's basically become extinct because simply people wanted too much money for their work and strikes were as common as eating.

Bail out package for GM; just delaying the inevitable.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...