Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Dan, it was a friends son. This guy knows the Australian Constitution off the top of his head, nothing can go against it. The only way to change the constitution is through a bill, I am pretty certain they will never change that one.

Even Local Councils are against the Constitution, said friend doesn't pay and hasn't paid rates for years. Yes the Council took him to court, he said his case and said that should they pursue it he will make it very public. They dropped it. I can go on for ages about it, remind me next time I see ya.

This guy is even a retired police officer, a very smart man.

any chance you could get the case name for us?

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=l53lbanVn3c

Looks australian to me... stupid media

yeah i sent today tonight an email bout my view on their whole getting the news article right but

dunno that they're care, i mean the vid was from 07, cant hurt to try i spose

yeah i sent today tonight an email bout my view on their whole getting the news article right but

dunno that they're care, i mean the vid was from 07, cant hurt to try i spose

Haha lol, please..if they send something back let us know, because we all know its not australian footage, pretty sure it was a closed of hill in jap land if i remember but dont quote me on tat.

I sincerely doubt you would get the case thrown out based on it was unconstitutional in the lower courts. Some guy quoting some bits from the constitution would just get laughed at. You'd expect someone would have brought up that argument with the criminal confiscation laws which allow you to be sentenced for the offence and the DPP then grab your assets even if it wasn't derived from the crime.

Unless you provide some details of the case and it's not just 'a friend of a friend told me' then it is useless spreading that rumour. And if it is true, why not tell everyone so that people can use the defense or have the laws changed? Really, if it did get thrown out it would be appealed all the way to the High Court by the government to decide if it was unconstitutional as the news would be all over the case and today tonight would be having a cry.

they may have amended the legislation. I believe 2nd offence is up to 3 months anyway. I thought 1st offence was 48 hours but maybe that has changed.

3rd offence is they take the car and sell it.

Edited by mickey

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...