Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Make/Model:

Mitsubish Sigma Scorpian GL

Year:

1983

Kilometers:

185,000

Car Specification and Mods:

2.6L 4 Cylinder Engine (JAP IMPORT) not the Australian made engines which are crap (due to a use of different metals and engineering differences)

5 Speed Manual

Holley Carburetter (180 dual throat, mechanical secondary)

Exhaust (2 inch after factory manifold)

Larger Sigma front anti roll bar

Manual gearbox out of GE Sigma 1850cc

Lightened standard flywheel

Modified tailshaft (to suit gearbox)

Welded center in differential

Firmer (and cut) springs

The tops of the struts have been turned 180 degrees to give slight negative camber

Harder four wheel drive compound front brake pads (Bendix)

Bonnet is shaved and held down by four metal pin-like supports on top of the bonnet

Has a turn-key battery disconnecter complies with CAMs rules.

No airconditioning (can't believe I was even asked this Wink)

Engine was rebuilt and actually has 85000km's on it.

Asking Price:

$1750 cash, make an offer.

Location:

Brisbane

Contact Details:

If you are interested pm and I will get back to you asap.

Other Comments:

This car is really fun to drive, love kicking the rear end out the side its fantastic. Engine is in top notch condition, the car has been so well looked afterl when I bought it, haven't used it so its still in good condition engine is kicked over and run every 2 weeks.

Comes with spare top-end or bottom end of engine some wheels with semi-slicks on them.

I do have another seat for the front left with rails however the rails need a slight modification to be mounted which won't be hard or cost much you just need a welder and 5-8mm thick steel plate and drill some holes weld up to the existing rails and wella you have a properly mounted front-left seat.

Do not have the rear interior.

Also comes with fire extinguisher.

Pictures (Click the pictures for larger view)

th_CIMG4195.jpg

th_CIMG4196.jpg

th_CIMG4197.jpg

th_CIMG4201.jpg

th_CIMG4203.jpg

th_dpig1.jpg

th_dpig2.jpg

th_dpig3.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You are selling this? I have never bought something from marketplace...i dont know if i trust that enough. And the price is little bit "too" good...
    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
×
×
  • Create New...