Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey there all.

Pulled the sun roof out to find shot loads of rust, decided that the only way to stop more movement, to remove the glass and descale sand antirust and thickly primer and coat in gloss, but only troubles removing the glass I shattered it.

Now ive cleaned up the metal insert and chosen the idea to use Perspex,

Does anyone know the thickness of the glass, or a better idea?

Nissan qouted me 1550$

Contacted 7 import wreckers and they don't work with full car shells let along sun roofs.

And a different brand roof replace is way too exy.

Any wrecked 32s with sun roofs??

Thanks

:)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/260424-r32-sunroof-rust/
Share on other sites

Any glazier can tell you what thickness the glass is just by feel; or of course, Vernier Calipers will give you the exact measurement.

Using the same thickness perspex (eg smoke colour could be cool), would probably need to be coated with something so that it doesn't scratch as a consequence of fine particles - but it would certainly be lighter than glass.

  • 2 weeks later...

hi!

Are you perhaps intrested in selling your shattered sunroof?

The rubber trimming on mine is broken, and this is not sold seperatly by nissan, so therefor I´m looking for a used one,so if your rubber trimming and the frame that holds it is in good shape and you want to sell it, then I´m intrested in buying it from you :P

/Philip

hi!

Are you perhaps intrested in selling your shattered sunroof?

The rubber trimming on mine is broken, and this is not sold seperatly by nissan, so therefor I´m looking for a used one,so if your rubber trimming and the frame that holds it is in good shape and you want to sell it, then I´m intrested in buying it from you :P

/Philip

I'd PM him Philip because the OP hasn't returned... except possibly to visit...

No ifs & buts that way.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...