Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Wow, this has been entertaining :D I miss much. ;)

That is a good point you make, I just don't want to see the fans go away in this time when the sport needs all the financial backing it can get from both spectators and sponsors. I fear if they ban the team, the team could possibly lose sponsorship and have it threaten their existence..... we will wait and see....

True. F1 survives on its sponsorship. Regardless of the size and popularity of F1 it needs the money rolling in to sustain it. I can't even imagine what solutions the management of this will come up with. The economics would be huge ... perhaps simple fines rather than ban?

  • Replies 470
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

im not the biggest fan of hamilton but i feel bad for him being caught up in all of this (if he is indeed innocent), not the ideal start to a F1 career. if its a fine they place on em, it has to be somewhere that will actually penalize the team, not just be written off as expenses on the end of year budget

im not the biggest fan of hamilton but i feel bad for him being caught up in all of this (if he is indeed innocent), not the ideal start to a F1 career. if its a fine they place on em, it has to be somewhere that will actually penalize the team, not just be written off as expenses on the end of year budget

he has already won a championship in his rookie season

what more do people want off him

they should just make them run on Wanli's next round, thats a punishment

hahaha would love to see then on that

things have seemingly calmed down in here by the looks of the last page.......probably a good thing I showed up late

Everyone, quick, look busy! :laugh:

meh

havent seen a real race champion since Mick Doohan ;)

F1 needs M.Doohan to get behind the wheel

I'm glad you said Doohan and not Rossi :thumbsup:

*sigh*...........

let me help you out a little with some advice, adding "ROFLMAO", "hahahahaha" & "LOL" dont help you achieve anything, they just add to your ongoing stupidity. once again you have kept responding, after you said you wouldnt. I almost pity you, your a mature aged man and your this pathetic...... kinda sad :s

Again Rhys ROFLMAO.... still can't answer my question..... Should I start calling you a liar too like you called me...? Now run along and go troll elsewhere.....

@Krishy - Lewis didn't win a championship in his rookie year LOL! He got handed it in his second year by a Toyota driver in Brazil!

facepalm.jpg

you stubborn old man, this thread had finally got back on track, mods had given it the a-ok, f1 discussion had begun and a new page with no rubbish on it yet your ego forced you to drag it down the drain again. so you 1) said you would not respond to me 2 times yet have proceeded too a number of times (pathetic old man ego) 2) appologised to other users for the ramblings yet continue to do so...... >ROFLMAOLOLO!11!11!11!< (if i do that at the end of the sentance does that make me as "intellectual" you?)

Again Rhys ROFLMAO.... still can't answer my question..... Should I start calling you a liar too like you called me...? Now run along and go troll elsewhere.....

@Krishy - Lewis didn't win a championship in his rookie year LOL! He got handed it in his second year by a Toyota driver in Brazil!

ohh my bad forgot that it was in his second year....as kimi won it in his rookie year

on another note...common boys....get along with it...FFS F1 DISCUSSIONS ONLY

well, this should be interesting now then!lol maybe they figure if they take it on the chin the penalty will be lighter as its saving time and hassle for those handing down the deccision? does anyone have any previous examples of penalties?

well, this should be interesting now then!lol maybe they figure if they take it on the chin the penalty will be lighter as its saving time and hassle for those handing down the deccision? does anyone have any previous examples of penalties?

previously i think they just hit them in the pocket etc....but i have also heard of where both the team cars start right at the back...if that happens then its very bad for Kovalienen as he hasnt done anything wrong....but then again its the Team that choose to lie not the individual...

should be interesting as to what happens though....i think that hamilton should be made to start the race from the back for the next 3 rounds....that should be enough for me :P

yeah seems a little unfair if they choose to punish the drivers rather than those from the team who lied. they will probably have some championship points stripped.

i think that mclaren might loose their constructors points and lewis might be loosing some points....also maybe starting from the rear of the grid for the next round and also some $$$

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...