Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi everyone

i have blown my sr and instead of replacing it im putting a neo rb25 in it and i have purchased the motor already but it came with no wiring loom i have a r33 rb25 loom spare and im wonedring if i can use that loom i know a couple of plugs mite be differant but i have downloaded the loom diagram for both motors and they are the exact same. i was hoping to do the wiring myself because i have done it a few times and have a fair idea on what to do.

for the intercooler setup i know that i cant run the intercooler pipe imbetween the radiator and the front of the motor so i was going to purchase the greddy inlet mani but i heard that ( i think ) its the traction control setup on throttle body causes a bit of grief doing that.

and i heard that the rb20 yoke for the gearbox is the exact same as the s14 sr box so i was going to run an rb20 box because i had an r32 drift car before that that had a 25 that was making 279 kw and it only had a 20 box in it and never missed a beat it copped a thrashing and was perfect so i would rather blow 3 of those boxes than 1 25 gearbox

just wondering on what u guys think would be my best option to go about these problems

thanx heaps

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/269546-neo-rb25-into-s14/
Share on other sites

I've got the bottom end or a wiring harness for a RB25 neo that was in an automatic Nissan Laurel if that helps any. It was chopped just before the ECU, so it should have most of the plugs you need.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah i found that alot of parts can be wrong or "very" hard to get the real right one. I already bought some brakes years ago on me "old" GT calipers and they were wrong too 😄  I told them too. Even send them pictures...but they said "EBC catalogue has them on my car... So i dont know what their answer will be. I call monday them and let them know that they are really not on my car. If they were they would be already on a car...
    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
×
×
  • Create New...